ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic.

The use of cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices continues under debate, seeing as the several analyses conducted so far have failed to show conclusive or significant results as regards effectiveness. 

The BHF PROTECT-TAVI included 7,601 patients undergoing TAVI: 3,798 were treated with the SENTINEL device, while the rest formed the control group.

The primary endpoint was stroke within 72 hours after procedure or before hospital discharge.

Population mean age was 81, and 39% were women. Mean EUROSCORE was 2.4%. Regarding comorbidities: 68% had hypertension, 20% diabetes, 8% TIA, 6% previous stroke, 33% coronary artery disease, 13% heart failure, 33% atrial fibrillation, 33.5% peripheral vascular disease, 13% aortic arch abnormalities (including bovine arch), and 8% bicuspid aorta.

Read also: ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Ejection fraction was <30% in 5.5% of patients and 30% to 49% in 18%. Mean gradient was 43 mmHg. Nearly half of patients showed aortic annulus severe calcification, and 4% showed outflow tract calcification.

No significant differences were observed in primary end point, with 2.1% stroke incidence among CEP patients and 2.2% among control group patients (difference: –0.02 percentage points; 95% CI: –0.68 to 0.63; p=0.94). Also, there were no differences in severe stroke incidence (0.5% vs. 0.5%; difference: 0.0 percentage points; 95% CI: –0.3 to 0.3), and most strokes occurred within the first 24 hours after procedure.

Read also: ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies.

Likewise, no differences were observed in disabling stroke between weeks 6 and 8 after TAVI (1.2% vs. 1.4%; difference: –0.2 percentage points; 95% CI: –0.7 to 0.4), or mortality within 72 hours, during hospitalization, or at 8 weeks.

Conclusion

Among patients undergoing TAVI, the routine use of cerebral protection devices did not reduce stroke incidence within the first 72 hours.

Original Title: Routine Cerebral Embolic Protection during Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation.

Reference: Rajesh K. Kharbanda, et al. NEJM DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2415120.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Hemodynamic Outcomes of Edge-to-Edge Repair in Degenerative and Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) has become an established therapeutic option for mitral valve disease. Among the available techniques, M-TEER using the MitraClip...

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...