Aspirin, Clopidogrel and Warfarin. Is it safe or is a triple scheme necessary?

Original title: Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial Reference: Dewilde WJ et al. Lancet. 2013 Mar 30;381(9872):1107-15

The question to answer was simple, relevant, and is increasingly frequent in everyday practice: what to do when a patient who is anticoagulated has to undergo angioplasty? Therapeutics with single or double antiplatelet therapy with anticoagulation? Researchers in the Dutch trial, an open-design, randomized and controlled 573 patients to two groups: dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin plus clopidogrel versus clopidogrel alone, with both branches obviously receiving warfarin. The results showed that taking aspirin out of the therapy scheme reduces the risk of bleeding and does not increase the risk of thrombotic events.

The total bleeding was reduced very significantly, (HR 0.36, meaning a decrease of 64%), and although this was from a predominance of minor bleeding, major bleeding also showed a similar trend with similar HR values, ( HR 0.56 major bleeding TIMI, HR 0.40 severe bleeding GUSTO). This indicates that although the difference in major bleeding was not statistically significant due to sample size, the trend was in the same direction and of similar magnitude. As for thrombotic events, although an increase in such cases was not found in the absence of aspirin, the study is small and lacks sufficient power to safely make this statement so these results must be confirmed by other studies. In particular, one cannot know whether removing aspirin in between will not cause more cases of stent thrombosis, a phenomenon of rare occurrence but catastrophic. Other interesting questions are: would the results be the same with new anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs and what would a third group have shown with aspirin plus anticoagulation but without clopidogrel?

It was considered that this test could be the “first nail in the coffin” of aspirin because it may no longer be necessary to consider it is required in all future antithrombotic studies of coronary patients. Patients at high risk of bleeding and anticoagulated patients are the subject of studies with new antithrombotic drugs in certain clinical scenarios and could be treated, (and it may be useful to be), without aspirin. 

Courtesy of a Dr. Alejandro Lakowsky
MTSAC.

Dr. Alejandro Lakowsky para SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Polymer-Free vs. Biodegradable Polymer Stents: SORT OUT IX 5-Year Outcomes

In a constant strive to achieve life time management, interventional cardiologists focus on optimizing coronary scaffolds, which calls for the development of devices with...

Chronic Stent Recoil and Its Long-Term Effects

The evolution of stent technology—including new scaffold designs, thinner struts, and more biocompatible polymers—has brought about an emerging concern: the late loss of structural...

PROSPECT II Substudy: Relationship Between Different Levels of hs-CRP and Vulnerable Plaque Characteristics in Patients with NSTEMI

Inflammation plays a key role in the onset and progression of atherosclerosis and has been linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular events, regardless...

Aspirin vs. Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1 Month of ACS: Subgroup Analysis Based on Bleeding Risk and MI Type

Current guidelines still recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the standard treatment in patients with acute...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Polymer-Free vs. Biodegradable Polymer Stents: SORT OUT IX 5-Year Outcomes

In a constant strive to achieve life time management, interventional cardiologists focus on optimizing coronary scaffolds, which calls for the development of devices with...

Three-Year Outcomes of Mitral Valve-in-Valve Therapy with Balloon-Expandable Valves in the United States

Gentileza del Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Mitral Valve-in-Valve (MViV) implantation with balloon-expandable valves has become a solid alternative for patients with degenerated mitral bioprostheses. However,...

Edge-to-Edge Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is characterized by severe ventricular dysfunction, most often of ischemic origin. It is frequently associated with severe mitral regurgitation (MR), either...