Rational use of bivalirudin, less bleeding and less costs using risk score

Original title: Pre-Procedural Estimate of Individualized Bleeding Risk Impacts Physicians’ Utilization of Bivalirudin During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Reference: Seshu C. Rao et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1847–52

While safety of coronary angioplasty has improved over time, post-procedure bleeding  is still frequent with a large variability between centers. Bleeding is associated with increased mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, increased hospital stay and higher costs. The risk score from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) can be used to classify patients into low (<1%), medium (1-3%) or high (3%) risk of bleeding according to 9 clinical variables pre-procedure. 

Bivalirudin has been shown to reduce bleeding complications and the benefit of this drug becomes greater the higher the risk of bleeding is.

This study included 6,491 patients who received coronary angioplasty between 2007 and 2011 comparing bleeding complications before and after 2009, when the NCDR bleeding risk score application was incorporated routinely. The use of bivalirudin increased globally from 26.9% to 34.2% (p <0.001) after risk scores began to apply. This was especially true for patients at intermediate risk (27% to 35%, p <0.001) and high (25% to 43%, p <0.001), however, its use declines for low-risk (30% 25%, p = 0.014). Post-procedure bleeding decreased after the prospective application of risk stratification. In low-risk patients the bleeding was similar both before and after application of the score (1.1% versus 1%, p = 0.976) nevertheless both in intermediate risk (3.4% versus 1.8%, p = 0.009) and high risk (6.9% versus 3.7%, p = 0.005) complications decreased significantly.

Conclusion:

The addition of an individualized risk of bleeding led to increased use of bivalirudin in patients with moderate and high risk and less use in low-risk. A concomitant  decrease in bleeding complications was observed in these patients.

Commentary:

Because the risk of bleeding is predictable and modifiable this is an ideal end point to observe the improvement in the daily practice of coronary angioplasty. Applying the score optimizes resources since the magnitude in reducing risk of bleeding depends on the initial patient. The article does not describe how many patients in this series received radial access, although it is expected that few did, since the bleeding edge in offering radial leaves little room for bivalirudin to show benefits. 

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....