Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the AMPLATZER : a valid alternative when anticoagulation is contraindicated

Original title: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug Device in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Contraindication to Anticoagulation Therapy Reference: Marina Urena, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013:62:96-102.

 

Anticoagulation is a good therapeutic strategy in nonvascular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is contraindicated in approximately 10% of patients, due to the risk of bleeding, apart from the fact that half of patients abandon treatment at year 3. In this context, left atrium closure devices could be beneficial.

The study included 52 patients that received the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug (St. Jude Medical, Mineapolis, Minnesota) for nonvascular AF, with ≥2% risk of stroke determined by a  ≥1 CHADS2 score or a  ≥2  CHA2DS2-VASc score and absolute contraindication to anticoagulants.

29 patients had had Stokes and 3 had had transient ischemic attacks (TIA). They had all received aspirin and clopidogrel before procedure, and had continued with double antiagregation therapy for, at least, 30 days. 

Procedure was successful in 51 patients, there was one device embolization after implant, which was recovered with no further complications and another one presented a transient ischemic attack. A post procedure transesophageal echocardiography showed the presence of mild intra and peridevice leak in 1 and 6 patients, respectively, that disappeared in all but one, at follow up.

At 20±5 months, a patient presented TIA, one presented stroke, one cardiac obstruction, one major bleeding related to coronary angioplasty and 3 died of non related causes. Five patients presented a mild peridevice leak at 6 months, which was associated to a low ejection fraction (p=0.01) but did not cause an embolism.

Conclusion:

In patients with nonvalvular auricular fibrillation with elevated risk of cardiac embolism and anticoagulation contraindication,  percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with AMPLATZER followed by a simple or double aggregation therapy is associated with a low rate of embolism and bleeding at 20 months. There was no residual severe leak or device thrombosis at 6 months. 

Commentary:

The percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with the AMPLATZER is a viable safe alternative for patients with contraindication to anticoagulation therapy. At 20 months follow up, no cardiac embolism events were observed after implantation. Mild leaks were not related to events.

Courtesy of Dr Carlos Fava.
Interventional Cardiology.
Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Dr. Carlos Fava para SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...