Ticagrelor similar to clopidogrel in terms of coronary flow and myocardial perfusion

Título original: Angiographic Outcomes in the PLATO Trial (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes). Referencia: Vijay Kunadian et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2013;6:671–83.

In the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial, treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel resulted in a significant reduction in the combined endpoint of cardiac death, heart attack or stroke in patients undergoing an acute coronary syndrome. Ticagrelor inhibits activation and platelet aggregation by blocking selective and reversible P2Y12 receptor. The mechanism of this clinical benefit would be a more potent and predictable antiplatelet so that this trial hypothesis is that ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel will improve angiographic end points of coronary flow and myocardial perfusion before and after angioplasty.

In this angiographic substudy of PLATO trial, 2068 patents were analyzed experiencing an acute coronary syndrome both with ST segment elevation (55.8% of the population) and no elevation (non ST infarct 34.6% and unstable angina 8.7%). After angioplasty  a myocardial perfusion grade 3 was obtained, identical between the two branches (ticagrelor 47.1% versus clopidogrel 46.9%, P = .96). The results were similar when patients were analyzed separately, those admitted with ST-segment elevation (42.4% versus 40.9%, p = 0.65) or without elevation (54% versus 55.9%, P = .64). Epicardial flow TIMI 3 was achieved in 88.1% of patients receiving ticagrelor versus 88.4% in those receiving clopidogrel (p = 0.28). 

Conclusion:

No differences were observed neither on the epicardial coronary flow not myocardial perfusion between patients receiving ticagrelor and those who received clopidogrel both before and after angioplasty

Commentary:

The benefit observed with glycoprotein inhibitors IIBIIIA in other works in terms of TIMI flow and myocardial perfusion before and after angioplasty was the point that made assuming that ticagrelor could show the same benefit given its anti-aggregating and more powerful effect. While the above might be true, so is that ticagrelor shares with clopidogrel oral administration and a single agonist blockade. 

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...