Primary angioplasty in octogenarians and nonagenarians is increasing in frequency.

Original title: Outcomes After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: From the Western Denmark Heart Registry. Reference: Lisbeth Antonsen et al. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 81:912–919 (2013)

With increasing life expectancy worldwide, older patients will become increasingly referred to us for angioplasty in the context of a heart attack with ST segment elevation. Often they do not receive all the available therapeutic strategy because the assumption is that their prognosis is already bad enough to not be able to change it. This is compounded by the lack of information available about the systematic exclusion of this age group in most randomized works. The aim of this study was to present the all-cause mortality at 30 days, one year and five years of octogenarians and nonagenarians who were referred for primary angioplasty between 2002 and 2009. 1,322 elderly patients were evaluated of which 91.8% were octogenarians and 8.2% nonagenarians.

The proportion of octogenarian patients referred for primary angioplasty increased from 5.5% in 2002 to 11.1% in 2009 but the proportion of nonagenarians remained stable (0.6% versus 0.8%).

12.1% of all elderly patients were admitted in a critical condition, (Killip IV, need for endotracheal intubation, balloon counterpulsation or systolic pressure

Conclusion:

The annual proportion of octogenarians referred for primary angioplasty doubled between 2002 and 2009 but the proportion of nonagenarians remained stable. While nonagenarians have the highest mortality both in the short and long term, this series showed a five-year acceptable survival rate of more than 40% in both groups.

Editorial Comment:

Although this study reports only mortality, other end points such as infarction, bleeding or kidney failure post procedure would be very useful for a correct measurement of risk / benefit. The consequence of the present behavior seems obvious with these results, so these patients should receive all the available therapeutic strategies as younger patients do. The delay in decision making may partly explain the percentage of patients admitted with hemodynamic instability.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....