Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Low flow impact on outcomes following TAVI should be taken into account

Original title: Impact of Low Flow on the Outcome of High-Risk Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Reference: Florent Le Ven, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 62;9:792-788

A study of low flow (SVi <35ml/m2) in the context of severe aortic stenosis has shown it is a predictor of worse outcomes after surgery, even though evolution with medical treatment in these patients is even worse.  The impact of this phenomenon in TVAR is has not yet been explored.  775 procedures were analyzed retrospectively, excluding the “valve-in-valve” procedures, TAVR for other indication than severe AS, and incomplete pre-procedural sonogram studies. Finally 639 patients were included in the study.

These were divided in four groups, according to gradient and flow: normal flow with high gradient, 195 patients; normal flow with low gradient, 110 patients; low flow with high gradient, 158 patients; and low flow with low gradient, 176 patients. This last group was divided into two groups of 86 and 90 patients with >50% and <50% ejection fraction, respectively.

Mortality at 30 days resulted significantly higher in the low flow group (11% vs 6% p=0.01). Death predictors were: male sex, diabetes, glomerular filtration rate, pulmonary hypertension, and

Those with reduced flow saw a higher mortality rate than the normal flow group, both cardiac and non-cardiac. On the contrary, the normal flow/high gradient group, normal flow/low gradient and low flow/high gradient groups presented a similar evolution. Among those that combined low flow and low gradient, there were no differences in all-cause mortality or cardiac mortality associated to ejection fraction. 

Conclusion:

Low flow is an independent predictor of early and late mortality after TVAR but not ejection fraction or low gradient. SVi should be integrated in the risk stratification process of these patients.

Comment: 

This study offers another variable to be taken into account when considering TVAR. Even though ejection fraction showed no impact at follow up, many other studies did associate it with worse evolution.

Courtesy of Dr Carlos Fava.
Interventional Cardiologist.
Favaloro Foundation, Argentina.

Dr. Carlos Fava para SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...