Type B Aortic Dissection over a 5-year period: lower mortality than medical therapy.

Original title: Survival After Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Type B Aortic Dissection. A Report From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Reference: Rossella Fattori et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2013;6:876–82.

Endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta is becoming a viable alternative, though its efficacy had not been followed up longer than two years.

This study was based on the IRAD registry (International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection) and compares long term outcomes of TBAAD receiving treated with TEVAR (thoracic endovascular repair) vs. medical therapy alone. The IRAD is a 24 center registry designed to provide information on TBAAD patients.

From 3865 patients included in the registry between 1995 and 2012, 1133 were diagnosed with type B dissection, 853 (74.8%) received medical therapy alone and 276 (25.2%) received TEVAR. TBAAD patients that required open surgery during the acute phase (n=183, 13.6%) were not included in this analysis.

Since it was not randomized, the study used a multivariate model with propensity score to balance the baseline differences between both groups. In-hospital mortality was similar for both strategies (10.9% TEVAR vs. 8.7% medical therapy, p=0.273) also at one year follow up. However, TEVAR had significantly lower mortality at five years, (15.5% vs 29%, p=0.018).

At five years, the descendant aorta diameter was also different between the groups: 42 mm for TEVAR patients and 46mm for medical therapy (p=0.034).

Conclusion: 

History supports the use of medical therapy for TBAAD. In the IRAD registry, TBAAD treated with TEVAR showed better survival rates compared to the medical therapy group. It seems that early intervention with TEVAR should be indicated for patients with uncomplicated TBAAD.

Editorial Comment

Patients who received TEVAR often presented signs of malperfusion (20.6% vs 4.8%; p<0.001) shock, periaortic hematoma, mesenteric ischemia, spinal cord ischemia, renal failure, etc. (61.7% vs 37.2%; p<0.001). Despite the above short-term results were similar to long-term medical treatment and higher. The Xin Jia group had already published in J Vasc Surg a similar cohort with similar outcomes, which adds more evidence in favor of TEVAR for TBAAD patients. 

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | SIRONA: Randomized Study Comparing Sirolimus-Coated vs Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Femoropopliteal Disease

This prospective, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated non-inferiority study compared the use of sirolimus-coated balloon (MagicTouch) vs paclitaxel-coated balloon in endovascular treatment.  The primary objective was to...

TCT 2024 | PEERLESS: Mechanical Thrombectomy with FlowTriever vs Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Intermediate Risk PTE

Pulmonary embolism (PE) continues to be the third cause of cardiovascular mortality. The current clinical guidelines recommend anticoagulation in intermediate risk patients presenting right...

Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: To Revascularize or Not

At long term, atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) can lead to hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and cardiac failure. Historically, these patients have been referred...

Endovascular Management of Chronic TEPH: Is Coronary Management Extrapolatable in This Scenario?

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a condition that causes significant functional limitation. Its surgical treatment, known as pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), has improved the...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: What Should Be our Approach?

Approximately 3% of the population over 65 years old has aortic stenosis. Current guidelines recommend valve replacement for patients with symptoms or an ejection...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...