Cilostazol reduces restenosis of DES in lesions larger than 40 mm.

Original title: Comparison of Dual Versus Triple Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent According to Stent Length (from the Pooled Analysis of DECLARE Trials). Reference: Seung-Whan Lee et al. Am J Cardiol 2013, article in press.

Cilostazol, an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase III , associated with aspirin and clopidogrel showed decrease angiographic restenosis both in conventional stents as well as in DES. DECLARE-DIABETES and DECLARE-LONG I and II studies yielded these results, however the question remained regarding which patients would benefit most and the absence of clear criteria that triple therapy did not come into daily practice.

This paper analyzed the angiographic follow up of the 1399 patients randomized to dual therapy (aspirin + clopidogrel) or triple therapy (aspirin + clopidogrel + cilostazol) in the 3 studies mentioned above. The primary objective of the study was to find stent restenosis indicators that justify cilostazol indication after angioplasty using DES. In the group with a triple scheme, in-stent restenosis was significantly reduced (8.2 % vs 13.6 % , RR 0.6 , CI 0.53 to 0.84, P = 0.003 ) and in- segment restenosis (9.0 % vs 15.7 %, RR 0.58 , CI 0.53 to 0.65 , p = 0.001). The cutoff in stent length from which benefit was significant with cilostazol was 39.5 mm. By dividing patients according to the length of stents implanted ( ≤ 20, 20 to 40 and ≥ 40 mm) we observed a significant difference in favor of the group receiving Cilostazol, -those who received ≥ 40 mm           (12.4 % vs 22.1 % , p = 0.008 ) . A similar trend was observed after dividing patients according to minimal luminal diameter ( ≤ 2.5, 2.5 to 3, and > 3 mm) with the greatest benefit in the smallest diameter ( p = 0.022 to ≤ 2.5 mm ) . 

Conclusion:

The triple scheme group (aspirin, clopidogrel, cilostazol) showed a significant reduction of restenosis in patients with more than 40 mm of stent length. Therefore, the use of the triple therapy may be readily employed in clinical practice after angioplasty using DES.

Editorial Comment

From a practical standpoint, the total length covered by stents is a simple guide for the indication of cilostazol after implantation of DES. Angiographic follow-up in these studies was set at 6 months (DECLARE-DIABETES y LONG I) and 8 months (DECLARE-LONG II), which is relatively premature and may be sub-estimated the restenosis. Drug-eluting stents used were mostly from 1st  generation so we must be cautious in extrapolating the results to the newer generations.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...