Infusion of bone marrow mononuclear cells in acute myocardial infarction, meta-analysis of all published to date.

Original title: Intracoronary stem cell infusion after acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and update on clinical trials. Reference: de Jong R, Houtgraaf JH, Samiei S, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;Epub ahead of print.

This meta-analysis included 30 randomized studies conducted between July 2002 and September 2013, totalling 2037 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Of the total, 1218 patients were treated with intracoronary or intravenous mononuclear cells infusion derived from bone marrow (22 studies), mesenchymal cells (3 studies), bone marrow progenitors (4 studies) and cells derived from cardiospheres (1 study).

In studies using mononuclear cells, an increment of the ejection fraction, reduced end-systolic volume and infarct size reduction was observed, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. In the subgroup analysis of 21 randomized studies using mononuclear cells derived from bone marrow, an increase of 2.08 % in ejection fraction compared with controls and 3.04 % per year (p = 0.008 ) was observed at 6 months. However, at 36 months and 60 months post procedure the effect was lost (1.19 %, p = 0.55).

The difference in ejection fraction for the group that received the cell infusion at 18 months, cut, was produced for the preservation of values

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....