The higher the bleeding risk, the greater the benefit of radial access in terms of mortality

Original title: Baseline bleeding risk and arterial access site practice in relation to procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. Presenter: Mamas A. Mamas et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1554-1564.

The transradial approach has been associated with reduced access site related bleeding complications as well as a reduced mortality in the context of PCI. It seems reasonable to assume that baseline bleeding risk could also influence the benefit associated to the transradial approach, but it has not yet been established.

This trial studied the relationship between baseline bleeding risk, the transradial approach and post PCI events of all patients included in the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database.

Baseline bleeding risk was calculated with the modified Mehran score in 348689 patients undergoing PCI between the years2006 and 2011. Patients were divided according to score in 4 categories of risk (low <10, moderate 10-14, high 15-19 and very high ≥20). The impact of baseline risk was analyzed on mortality at 30 days, according to access site.

Radial access was associated to a reduction of 35% mortality at 30 days (OR 0.65, IC 95% 0.59 to 0.72; p < 0.0001) and this reduction was associated to baseline bleeding risk (for those with

Conclusion

The transradial approach was independently associated to a reduction of mortality at 30 days and the magnitude of this effect was associated to bleeding risk. PCI patients with higher risk of bleeding are the ones that most benefit from the transradial approach.

Editorial Comment

In this study of the daily practice it was observed that 43% of patients with the lowest bleeding risk received the radial approach and, unexpectedly, only 40% of patients with the highest bleeding risk saw the same benefit. Even though there is enough evidence to adopt the transradial approach in all patients, we should give special attention to those with higher risk of bleeding, risk that should be calculated prior to intervention and should be known by the operator for him to make an informed decision on the most appropriate access site.

SOLACI

More articles by this author

OCT- and IVUS-Guided Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has reduced mortality in the acute phase. However, recurrent ACS and target vessel...

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

OCT- and IVUS-Guided Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has reduced mortality in the acute phase. However, recurrent ACS and target vessel...

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...