Lower Rates of In-Stent Thrombosis with the New Generation DES

Original title: New-generation drug-eluting stents reduce stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction: a propensity-score-adjusted analysis from the multicenter REAL registry. Reference: Vignali L et al. Cath Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; Epub ahead of print.

Compared to the first generation of drug eluting stents (DES), the new generation has a lower long term risk of in-stent thrombosis and acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

This study analyzed data from 2775 patients receiving first generation DES and 2557 receiving new generation DES included in the REAL registry (multicenter registry in the north of Italy) between 2007 and 2011.

At 3 years, new generation DES were associated to lower AMI and definite thrombosis rates comparted to the first DES, though the combined events rate (death, infarction and revascularization) were no different between the groups. 

After propensity score matching, 3 year death rates turned out similar (new generation 7% vs. first generation 8.7%, HR 0.85, IC 0.68 to 1.06) as well as infarction rate (new generation 5% vs. first generation 7.4%, HR 0.65, IC 0.5 to 0.82) and revascularization (10.9% vs. 13.5% respectively, HR 0.99, IC 0.84 to 1.16). The only significant difference was seen in definite thrombosis rates (new generation 0.5% vs. first generation 1.1%, HR 0.35, IC 0.17 to 0.72).

Conclusion

This multicenter registry included data from real life patients confirming that new generation DES compared to first generation DES are associated with similar efficacy but a greater long term safety, due to the lower in-stent thrombosis and AMI rates.

Editorial Comment

Several randomized studies and meta-analysis had shown that newer DES has a better safety profile; however, the present study is one of the largest registries, with the longest follow up period, which confirmed these outcomes in the daily practice.

SOLACI

More articles by this author

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...