Lower Rates of In-Stent Thrombosis with the New Generation DES

Original title: New-generation drug-eluting stents reduce stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction: a propensity-score-adjusted analysis from the multicenter REAL registry. Reference: Vignali L et al. Cath Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; Epub ahead of print.

Compared to the first generation of drug eluting stents (DES), the new generation has a lower long term risk of in-stent thrombosis and acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

This study analyzed data from 2775 patients receiving first generation DES and 2557 receiving new generation DES included in the REAL registry (multicenter registry in the north of Italy) between 2007 and 2011.

At 3 years, new generation DES were associated to lower AMI and definite thrombosis rates comparted to the first DES, though the combined events rate (death, infarction and revascularization) were no different between the groups. 

After propensity score matching, 3 year death rates turned out similar (new generation 7% vs. first generation 8.7%, HR 0.85, IC 0.68 to 1.06) as well as infarction rate (new generation 5% vs. first generation 7.4%, HR 0.65, IC 0.5 to 0.82) and revascularization (10.9% vs. 13.5% respectively, HR 0.99, IC 0.84 to 1.16). The only significant difference was seen in definite thrombosis rates (new generation 0.5% vs. first generation 1.1%, HR 0.35, IC 0.17 to 0.72).

Conclusion

This multicenter registry included data from real life patients confirming that new generation DES compared to first generation DES are associated with similar efficacy but a greater long term safety, due to the lower in-stent thrombosis and AMI rates.

Editorial Comment

Several randomized studies and meta-analysis had shown that newer DES has a better safety profile; however, the present study is one of the largest registries, with the longest follow up period, which confirmed these outcomes in the daily practice.

SOLACI

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | Protect The Head-To-Head Trial: Randomized Comparison Between Emboliner and Sentinel During TAVI

Ischemic stroke remains one of the most feared complications of TAVI, with a relatively low but persistent incidence of 2–4%, without significant reduction over...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...