Despite the evidence, visual estimation continues to dominate the decision on intermediate lesions

Original title: Revascularization Decisions in Patients With Stable Angina and Intermediate Lesions. Results of the International Survey on Interventional Strategy. Reference: Gabor G. Toth et al. CircCardiovascInterv. 2014. Epubahead of print.

 

Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) is recommended by the guidelines and supported by evidence in intermediate lesions when not any proof of ischemia is available by noninvasive testing. The International Survey on Interventional Strategy evaluated the preferred approach of 495 experienced Interventional Cardiologists from several centers around the world who gave their opinion on a total of 4421 injuries. In the case of intermediate lesions by visual estimation they had the choice to define the strategy using the following; quantitative angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fractional flow reserve (FFR). In 3158 lesions (71%), the decision was made relying merely on the angiographic appearance that in other hand was discordant in 47% with the measurement of FFR. 

FFR or other imaging modalities were required at 21% and 8% respectively. When comparing the 4 groups of participants according to their experience in FFR, it was observed that decisions based exclusively on angiography were less frequent as the FFR experience increased (77% versus 72% versus 69% versus 67%, respectively; p <0.001). As a result, the FFR was used more frequently (14% versus 19% versus 24% versus 28%, respectively; p <0.001) and the number of discordant decisions decreased (51% versus 49% versus 47% versus 43%, respectively; p <0.022).

Conclusion

These findings confirm that the visual estimation continues ruling the decision making in intermediate lesions indicating a worrying disengage between evidence, guidelines, and daily practice.

Editorial comment

Cost seems the simplest explanation that arises from the difference of what should be done and what is done in practice. Yet, all these interventionists had the possibility to select any of the methods available and they did not because they simply relied on angiography.

SOLACI

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

AHA 2024 – BPROAD

Hypertension (elevated blood pressure, BP) is the most common comorbidity among diabetic patients and has been associated with higher cardiovascular risk, though as a...

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

EuroSMR Registry: Edge-to-Edge Mitral Treatment with 5-Year Outcomes

Cardiomyopathies and left atrial enlargement can lead to secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). This condition is associated with ventricular dysfunction, causing heart failure, hospitalization, and...

TricValve Transcatheter Bicaval Valve System for Severe Tricuspid Insufficiency: Events at One Year

TricValve is the first bicaval valve system to obtain CE-Mark approval. This device heterotopic device eliminates tricuspid insufficiency reflux into the venous system, reducing...

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...