OCT useful to assess non ostial left main lesions

Original title: Frecuency domain optical coherente tomography to assess non-ostial left main artery. Reference: Francesco Burzotta, et al. EuroIntervention 2015;10e1-e8

 

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has proved valuable in making decisions and monitoring stents implanted in coronary arteries, but its role in the assessment of left main (LM) lesions remains unclear.

The study included 54 patients presenting moderate to severe LM de novo lesions and bifurcation with anterior descending and circumflex ostia compromise and compared OCT to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). 

After OCT, 26 patients (48%) received PCI, 25 (47%) medical treatment and 3 (5%) myocardial revascularization surgery. There was a good correlation between LM segment length, artefact frames, minimal lumen area and reference lumen area. The mean number of LM artefact frames was 8±10 (19%) and was more frequent at proximal and ostial level than at distal level (43.3% vs. 2.1% p<0.0001).

There was high correlation between OCT and QCA except for LM length, which was more efficient with QCA (8.4 vs. 11.6 p=0.001).

Conclusion

Study results show that OCT is feasible with good quality imaging for non ostial LM lesions. Assessment is more efficient for distal than proximal lesions.

Editorial Comment

OCT has proved to be safe and to provide quality imaging superior to IVUS, but in LM lesions this is different, since it has important technical limitations to assess ostial and proximal lesions.

To determine segment length, perhaps we should use not just one method but many, such as FFR, IVUS and even QCA. Another limitation to OCT is the need to use contrast to obtain images, especially in patients presenting compromised kidney function and renal failure.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava
Interventional Cardiologist
Favaloro Foundation 
Buenos Aires -Argentina

Carlos Fava

More articles by this author

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

QFR vs. FFR: Is Coronary Revascularization Deferral Safe? Results from a FAVOR III Sub-Analysis

In cases of intermediate coronary lesions, functional assessment is recommended to aid the decision-making process regarding revascularization. There are several tools currently used to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...