Linear relationship between prognosis and FFR value

Original title: Prognostic Value of Fractional Flow Reserve Linking Physiologic Severity to Clinical Outcomes. Reference: Nils P. Johnson et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1641–54.

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become an essential tool for guiding treatment, but its graded relationship to prognosis and its influence by medical treatment vs revascularization, remains unclear.

The hypothesis of this study is that FFR presents a continuous relationship between numerical value and prognosis, such that the lower the FFR values, the higher the risk of major events and, therefore, the larger the absolute benefit from revascularization.

9173 patients were analyzed and followed up during 16 months in average. Clinical events increased as FFR values decreased and revascularization showed greater net benefit for the lowest baseline FFR values.

FFR cutoff values as from which and interaction with prognosis was observed were between 0.75 and 0.8. FFR measured immediately after stenting showed an inverse relationship with future events (HR 0.86, CI 95% 0.80 to 0.93; p<0.001). An FFR guided strategy leads to revascularization half as often as an angiography guided strategy but with 20% less events and 10% more freedom from angina.

Conclusion

FFR proved a continuous and independent relation with future events and this can be influenced by revascularization. Lesions with the lowest FFR values receive the highest absolute benefit from revascularization. FFR measured after stenting showed an inverse relationship with risk.

Editorial Comment

FFR can be seen not only as a “biological marker” given its continuous and independent relation with prognosis, but also as a treatment goal, given that revascularization significantly change the events curve. FFR is an objective tool to balance the risk/benefit ratio in each patient, not as a dichotomy but as a continuous relationship.

SOLACI

More articles by this author

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

QFR vs. FFR: Is Coronary Revascularization Deferral Safe? Results from a FAVOR III Sub-Analysis

In cases of intermediate coronary lesions, functional assessment is recommended to aid the decision-making process regarding revascularization. There are several tools currently used to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...