Is the 2nd generation DES an alternative to surgery in multivessel coronary disease?

The benefits of 2nd generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are being compared with Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), looking to achieve a safe, effective, less invasive and as complete as possible revascularization. As background of SYNTAX, the stent thrombosis (ST) with Taxus, reached 25% of the events in the group of intervention (PCI), so that the appearance of the 2nd generation DES with greater safety and reduced ischemic events gave new hope to this therapy.

 

The BEST is a randomized, non-inferiority study, which compared 448 patients assigned to PCI versus 442 assigned to CABG. Patients with at least two severe lesions (>50%) were included in different vessels. We excluded patients with severe LMCA disease.

 

The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or revascularization of treated vessel at 2 years of randomization. Secondary endpoints were one composed of safety (death, MI, stroke, or any new revascularization) plus the components of the primary individualized, intrastent thrombosis and greater or fatal bleeding.

 

The primary endpoint at 2 years was similar (PCI 11% versus CABG 7.9%) but at 4.6 years occurred more frequently in PCI (PCI 15.3% versus CABG 10.6%, HR 1.47; CI 95%, 1.01 to 2.13; p = 0.04) and more significantly in diabetics (PCI 19.2% versus CABG 9.1%, p = 0.007). The composite secondary endpoint was PCI 19.9%.

 

Original title: Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Coronary Disease. The BEST Trial. 
Reference: Seung-Jung Park, M.D., Ph.D., Jung-Min Ahn, M.D., Young-Hak Kim, M.D. et al. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1204-1212 March 26, 2015.

More articles by this author

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...

OCT- and IVUS-Guided Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has reduced mortality in the acute phase. However, recurrent ACS and target vessel...

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...