After 80: The octogenarian patients with acute coronary syndrome benefit from an aggressive strategy

This work published simultaneously in The New England Journal of Medicine showed that patients over eighty years may benefit from an aggressive and invasive treatment strategy that could be unnecessarily denied given age.

The study was conducted in 16 centers in Norway and included 458 octogenarians patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation randomized 1:1 to a more conservative strategy with medical treatment or a more aggressive treatment with coronary angiography. In patients who underwent invasive strategy a reduction of 47% was observed compared with event conservatively branch.

Since the population above age 80 is not represented in the classic works of invasive versus conservative strategy in many places tend not to be treated according to the guidelines. This is the first study specifically designed for this population and showed that elderly patients also benefit from an invasive treatment.

Nicolai Tegn
2015-03-18

Original title: Invasive vs. Conservative Strategy in Patients Over 80 Years With Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction or Unstable Angina Pectoris Clinical Trial – After Eighty Study.

More articles by this author

TOTAL: The thromboaspiration provides no benefit in primary angioplasty

In patients undergoing ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who received primary angioplasty, the strategy of manual thromboaspiration routine does not reduce the risk...

MATRIX: The radial access reduces events, bivalirudin with mixed results

Two separate works are part of the MATRIX study investigating strategies to reduce bleeding and mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The first...

IMPROVE-IT: The combination simvastatin / ezetimibe reduces post SCA events

This work included 18144 patients from 39 countries that were admitted pursuing an acute coronary syndrome (with or without ST segment elevation) randomized 1:...

DANAMI3: Primary Angioplasty to culprit vessel versus multivessel guided by FFR

The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of primary angioplasty only to culprit vessel versus complete revascularization guided by fractional flow...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

Drug-Eluting Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: When Should They Be Used?

Peripheral drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of peripheral arterial disease by reducing restenosis rates and the need for repeat interventions. However, the emergence...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...