CULPRIT: Complete revascularization versus culprit artery of infarct only

Current guidelines suggest treating only the culprit artery of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. This prospective and randomized work included 296 patients in 7 centers suffering ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction referred for primary angioplasty randomized to treat only the culprit artery (n = 146) versus complete revascularization (n = 150). 

In the culprit artery group, 90% of drug-eluting stents were used and in the complete revascularization group 95%. One year follow-up, the primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, heart failure and the need to repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the complete revascularization group (10% versus 21.1%, P = 0.009). The procedure time and contrast volume were obviously higher in the complete revascularization group. No differences in major bleeding, stroke or contrast nephropathy were observed. 

Article

7_anthony_gershlick_presentacion
Anthony H Gershlick
2014-09-01

Original title: Complete versus lesion only primary -PCI Trial (CvLPRIT): Treat the infarct related artery only or all lesions.

 

More articles by this author

NONI: Inhaled nitric oxide to reduce reperfusion injury in myocardial infarction

Infarct size is an independent predictor of survival and ventricular function. Several alternatives have been tried to reduce the size of the infarcted area...

ATLANTIC: administration of ticagrelor in the ambulance versus in the cath lab

The platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonist ticagrelor is shown to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events when administered in hospital admission to patients suffering an...

MITOCARE: TRO40303 intravenous infusion in the context of primary angioplasty

Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated intravenous infusion of TRO40303 versus placebo administered immediately before balloon dilation of the culprit artery during primary angioplasty....

FAMOUS NSTEMI: FFR versus Angiography in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

The benefit of myocardial revascularization (angioplasty or surgery) guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the context of acute coronary syndromes is poorly studied...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...