ISAR-SAFE: 6 vs. 12 month clopidogrel administration after DES implantation

The aim of this randomized double blind control trial was to validate the safety and efficacy of 6 months vs. 12 months clopidogrel treatment in patients receiving DES.

Primary end point was a combination of death, infarction, in-stent thrombosis, stroke and major bleeding. Secondary end point was the individual analysis of each one of the primary end point components. Recruiting saw early termination with 4000 patients, due to lower-than-expected event rates and slow recruitment. 

Most patients were treated with new generation DES. Primary end point incidence was similar in both groups (1.3% for the 6 month group vs. 1.5% in the 12 month; p=0.5). Though not significantly, bleeding rate was lower at 6 months. 

Conclusion

No significant differences were observed in both ischemic and bleeding events with clopidogrel at 6 and 12 months after DES stenting. Events rate was lower than expected, which led to early termination. 

Stefanie Schulz Schüpke
2014-11-17

Original title: Randomized, Double Blind Trial of 6 Versus 12 Months Of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After DES-Implantation (ISAR-SAFE).

More articles by this author

Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with the use of automated external defibrillators

This study included patients presenting out of hospital cardiac arrest between 2006 and 2012 in The Netherlands to assess the impact of automated external...

Coronary flow reserve is associated to adverse events regardless angiographic severity.

This study included 329 consecutive patients derived to coronary angiography based on myocardial perfusion tests or PET scan (positron emission tomography). The extension and...

ITALIC PLUS: 6 months of double antiaggregation for no less than 24 months

Article This multicenter study included patients receiving the second generation stent XIENCE V (Abbott Vascular) randomized to 6 and 24 months of double antiaggregation therapy...

DAPT TRIAL: double antiaggregation remains controversial

Article This multicenter randomized control study with placebo was designed to determine the risks and benefits of double antiaggregation for longer than 12 months post...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...