ISAR-SAFE: 6 vs. 12 month clopidogrel administration after DES implantation

The aim of this randomized double blind control trial was to validate the safety and efficacy of 6 months vs. 12 months clopidogrel treatment in patients receiving DES.

Primary end point was a combination of death, infarction, in-stent thrombosis, stroke and major bleeding. Secondary end point was the individual analysis of each one of the primary end point components. Recruiting saw early termination with 4000 patients, due to lower-than-expected event rates and slow recruitment. 

Most patients were treated with new generation DES. Primary end point incidence was similar in both groups (1.3% for the 6 month group vs. 1.5% in the 12 month; p=0.5). Though not significantly, bleeding rate was lower at 6 months. 

Conclusion

No significant differences were observed in both ischemic and bleeding events with clopidogrel at 6 and 12 months after DES stenting. Events rate was lower than expected, which led to early termination. 

Stefanie Schulz Schüpke
2014-11-17

Original title: Randomized, Double Blind Trial of 6 Versus 12 Months Of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After DES-Implantation (ISAR-SAFE).

More articles by this author

Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with the use of automated external defibrillators

This study included patients presenting out of hospital cardiac arrest between 2006 and 2012 in The Netherlands to assess the impact of automated external...

Coronary flow reserve is associated to adverse events regardless angiographic severity.

This study included 329 consecutive patients derived to coronary angiography based on myocardial perfusion tests or PET scan (positron emission tomography). The extension and...

ITALIC PLUS: 6 months of double antiaggregation for no less than 24 months

Article This multicenter study included patients receiving the second generation stent XIENCE V (Abbott Vascular) randomized to 6 and 24 months of double antiaggregation therapy...

DAPT TRIAL: double antiaggregation remains controversial

Article This multicenter randomized control study with placebo was designed to determine the risks and benefits of double antiaggregation for longer than 12 months post...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | Protect The Head-To-Head Trial: Randomized Comparison Between Emboliner and Sentinel During TAVI

Ischemic stroke remains one of the most feared complications of TAVI, with a relatively low but persistent incidence of 2–4%, without significant reduction over...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...