PRAGUE 14: Anti-thrombotic therapy before non-cardiac surgery may be associated with a higher incidence of bleeding.

The majority of coronary patients are under anti-thrombotic therapy and its interruption may increase cardiovascular risk, while on the other hand, continuation during a surgical procedure may increase the risk of bleeding.

This study, which included 1211 patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery, compared the interruption of anti-thrombotic therapy at least 7 days prior vs continuing the therapy.

The majority of the patients (83.7%) were receiving anti-thrombotic therapy within one month of the surgery and the most frequent drug was aspirin (53.3%), followed by Warfarin, 23.4%.

The incidence of cardiovascular complications was 7.6% and perioperative bleeding, 13.3%. Of those who presented cardiovascular complications, 37.4% died compared with 1.26% of those who bled.

Conclusion: 

This study showed that the interruption of anti-thrombotic therapy closer to surgery is not associated with the reduced risk of cardiovascular complications in the general population. 


P. Widimsky
2013-09-02

Original title: PRAGUE 14: Perioperative ischemia versus perioperative bleeding in consecutive cardiac patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

More articles by this author

INTIME: Home monitoring of severe heart failure patients gives promising results.

Rehospitalization or death due to worsening heart failure is often preceded by changes in clinical parameters, weight or arrhythmias. The home monitoring device has...

DECAAF: Pre ablation magnetic resonance in patients with atrial fibrillation is capable of detecting the degree of fibrosis and predicting the success of...

260 patients with atrial fibrillation were included who underwent nuclear magnetic resonance 30 days before ablation and 90 days following. The patients were classified...

LINC: The LUCAS device failed to demonstrate benefit in cardiac arrest patients.

Each year between 300,000 and 400,000 people suffer an out-of-hospital heart attack in Europe. Only between 5% and 7% of these patients survive and...

PARIS: Interruption of dual antiplatelet treatment can be safe depending on the clinical context and treatment time

The cessation of dual antiplatelet treatment increased the risk of post coronary intervention adverse events. It is unclear whether the risk varies through time...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...