REPRISE II: LOTUS valve for percutaneous aortic valve replacement

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new device in patients with severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk. We included 120 patients with a mean age of 84 years and the aortic valve area of 0.7 cm2. The device was successfully implanted in all patients with a 15% rate of moderate to severe aortic regurgitation after implantation and 28% of pacemaker requirement. No migration or embolization of the valve was observed. A 30-days,  mortality was 4.2% and stroke 1.7%.

9_ian_meredith
Ian Meredith
2013-10-31

Original title: REPRISE II: A Prospective Registry Study of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Repositionable Transcatheter Heart Valve in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis

More articles by this author

TRANSLATE-POPS: Routine measurement of platelet aggregation generates a minimal impact on the treatment setting

The high platelet reactivity is associated with adverse events after stent implantation. Current guidelines consider the measurement of aggregability as a class IIB and...

TATORT-NSTEMI: Routinely thromboaspiration in patients with non ST-elevation AMI

Thromboaspiration in patients with ST-elevation is being questioned while in patients without elevation this strategy has not been studied. The study included 440 patients...

GIANT: Evaluation of the genetic profile of CYP2C19 in patients undergoing primary angioplasty

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact resistance thienopyridines through genetic analysis of CYP2C19 receptor. The primary endpoint was  a...

HYBRID: Hybrid revascularization in patients with multi-vessel

We included 200 patients (100 with hybrid revascularization and 100 with conventional surgery). The complete revascularization rate was similar between both groups (70%). Also,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | Protect The Head-To-Head Trial: Randomized Comparison Between Emboliner and Sentinel During TAVI

Ischemic stroke remains one of the most feared complications of TAVI, with a relatively low but persistent incidence of 2–4%, without significant reduction over...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...