Different Options for Aspirin Hypersensitivity in PCI

Original Title: Efficacy and Safety of Available Protocols for Aspirin Hypersensitivity for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Survey and Systematic Review. Reference: Bianco M et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan;9(1):e002896.

The follow up strategy for aspirin hypersensitive patients undergoing PCI remains unclear.

A systematic search included 283 patients from 11 studies. Primary end point was discharge with aspirin, while adverse events rate was the secondary end point.

Only one of the studies performed an endovenous desensitization protocol that was highly effective (98%) and saw few adverse events, compared to the rest of protocols with oral administration of escalating doses of aspirin.

There were no significant differences among the oral desensitization protocols (more vs. less fractioned) in terms of efficacy, while the incidence of rash and angioedema were higher in those protocols using less than 6 doses escalation.

During follow up, 65% of physicians managed aspirin hypersensitivity by changing the therapeutic regimen (e.g. Clopidogrel as monotherapy).
Despite prior safety data, desensitization protocols were used only by 42% of cardiologists.

Conclusion
The existing protocols to treat aspirin hypersensitivity are safe and effective and represent a viable option for patients that need dual antiaggregation therapy and are allergic to aspirin.

Editorial Comment
One of the desensitization protocols is the oral administration of 6 escalating doses of aspirin (1, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 100 mg) in 5.5 hours with or without simultaneous administration of corticoids and antihistamines. According to this study, consecutive doses should not be less than 6, because of the higher chance of angioedema and rash.

More articles by this author

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...

TAVR and Anticoagulation: What Should We Do?

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has consolidated as a valid strategy for certain groups of patients. However, approximately one third of those who require...

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Ventricular Thrombus After STEMI

While the incidence of intracavitary thrombi after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has decreased thanks to optimized primary angioplasty times, some studies report rates of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...