Diabetes has higher impact on DES outcomes than disease complexity

Original Title: Impact of diabetic status on outcomes after revascularization with drug-eluting stents in relation to coronary artery disease complexity. Reference: Koskinas KC et al. Circ Cardiovasc Intv. 2016; Epub ahead of print

 

Diabetic patients ongoing PCI with drug eluting stents (DES) are at higher risk of repeat revascularization than non-diabetic patients. According to this new analysis, the impact of diabetes on DES outcomes is not affected by SYNTAX score or the use of new generation DES.

These findings show that diabetes alone, and not disease complexity, justifies poor outcomes in these patients.

This study analyzed 4 large studies (SIRTAX, RESOLUTE All Comers, BIOSCIENCE and LEADERS) including a total of 6081 patients between 2004 and 2013. There were no restrictions in the number of lesions, treated vessels, lesion length or number of implanted stents. In all, 22% of patients had a history of diabetes and 75% received first generation DES.

Diabetic patients presented a higher median Syntax score (13.9 vs 12.9; P< 0.001) and received multivessel PCI more often (25% vs 22%; P =0.03) than the non-diabetic cohort.

After multivariable adjustment, the combined events rate (primary end point of cardiac death, non-fatal infarction and clinically indicated target vessel revascularization) was higher for the diabetic group (HR 1.25, CI 95% 1.03 to 1.53), as were vessel and lesion revascularization (HR 1.54, CI 95% 1.18 to 2.01 and HR 1.38, CI 95% 1.08 to 1.76 respectively).

However, events such as cardiac death, non-fatal infarction and stent thrombosis saw no differences between the groups.

All these data were no different when analyzing only patients receiving new generation DES (n=4554).

In multivariable analysis, there was no formal interaction as regards events in the group of diabetic patients stratified according to Syntax score. Assessing Syntax score as an ongoing variable to avoid the possible confounder, an arbitrary cut off, also showed no interactions.

Conclusion
In this population treated mainly with new generation DES, diabetic patients presented an increased risk of repeat revascularization across the spectrum of disease complexity.

Editorial Comment
In the FREEDOM study, the Syntax score did not predict events neither in patients receiving PCI or CABG. The SYNTAX showed just the opposite: events increased proportionally to score, basically given the higher rate of reinterventions.

To sum up, diabetes still has the highest impact on restenosis in the new DES era, even on simple lesions.

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...