LEMANS Trial: Left main stenting vs. surgery at 10 years

Original Title: Left main stenting in Comparison with Surgical Revascularization 10-year outcomes of the (Left Main Coronary Stenting) LE MANS trial. Reference: Buszman P et al. J Am CollCardiolIntv. 2016;9(4):318-327. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.044.

Courtesy of Dr. Guillermo Migliaro.

Long term outcomes of left main stenting are unknown. This study reports 10 year follow up outcomes of the LEMANS trial patients. The LEMANS, a prospective, multicenter and randomized trial, included 105 patients with left main stenosis randomized to PCI with stenting (n=52) vs. myocardial revascularization surgery (CABG) (n=53).

First generation drug eluting stents were used in 35% of patients and graft to the left anterior descending artery in 73%. Patients had low to medium disease complexity, with an average Syntax score of 25 (even though there was no measure at the time of randomization) and an average EuroSCORE of 3.3. Patients were followed up 9.8±1 years.

At year 10, there was a tendency (though not significant) to higher ejection fraction (this was the primary end point for the first year follow up) in the PCI group (54.9±8.3% vs 49.8±10.3% p=0.07). Mortality (21.6 vs 30.2%; p=0.41) and MACCE (51.1 vs64.4%; p=0.28) were not statistically significant, despite a difference in number in favor of PCI.

Neither were there significant differences in MI (8.7 vs 10.4% p=0.62), stroke (4.3 vs 6.3% p=0.62) or repeat revascularization rates incidence (74.2 vs 67.5% p=0.34). Survival rate at 14 years was similar in both groups (74.2 vs 67.5% p=0.34) as well as MACCE-free survival rate(34.7 vs 22.1% p=0.06). Angina functional class was low and comparable in both groups (1.7±0.9 vs 1.59±0.8)

Conclusion
In patients with left main stenosis with low to medium coexisting disease complexity, PCI has safe and effective outcomes comparable to those of CABG at very long term and, therefore, constitutes a valid alternative for these group of patients.

Editorial Comment
This is the first randomized study to compare both strategies and, at present, the first to show 10 year outcomes, which brings a unique and valuable contribution to the medical community.

This trial included few patients and has low statistical power to assess mortality.

It used a low number of DES and these were first generation.Artery grafts were also few in the CABG group.

The outcomes obtained in this study match those reported by larger studies (Syntax andPrecombat), though they extend to 5 year follow up periods.

We look forward to larger multicenter studies with second generation DES.

Courtesy of Dr. Guillermo Migliaro.

More articles by this author

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...

Perforation Management in Bifurcations: Bench Testing of Bailout with Covered Stents

Coronary perforations during PCI are one of the most dreaded complications in interventional cardiology, especially in bifurcations. Though rate, this critical situation requires an...

EMERALD II: Non-Invasive Coronary Anatomy and Physiology (CCTA) in ACS Prediction

Despite steady progress in secondary prevention and medical treatment optimization (OMT), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbimortality....

Left or Right Transradial Approach? Comparing Radiation Exposure in Coronary Procedures

Radiation exposure during percutaneous procedures is a problem both for patients and operators. The transradial is currently the preferred approach, vs. femoral; however, whether...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Endoleaks after endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: always reintervene or monitor with CTA?

Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms requiring sealing above the renal arteries, with preservation of visceral vessels using fenestrated and/or branched devices (F/B-EVAR), has become...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...