Beta Blockers Could Improve Outcomes in Carotid Artery Stenting

Original Title: Beta-blocker use is associated with lower stroke and death after carotid artery stenting. Reference: Tammman Obeid, et al. J Vasc. Surg. 2016;63:363-9.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

The latest trials on Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) have shown significantly improved effectiveness. The use of drugs such as beta blockers (BB) have proved beneficial in some studies, though it remains controversial.

5263 patients undergoing CAS were analyzed; 2152 (40%) had never received BB, 259 (4%) received BB between 1 and 30 days prior stenting and 2837 (53.9%) had been receiving BB >30 days prior procedure.

The groups were similar, mean age was 68 and most of them were men.

At 30 days, death and stoke rate was 3.4% (minor stroke 1.5%, major stroke 0.9% and death 1.2%) and there were no MI cases. 40% of patients presenting major stroke died within 30 days after procedure. 22% presented post procedural hypotension, unrelated to the use of BB. Instead, hypertension requiring treatment was 9.9% and it was frequent between patients receiving BB between days 1 and 30; it was associated to a 3.4 fold increase in stroke/death incidence (OR 3.39; CI 95% 2.3-5.00; p<0.0001). Hemorrhagic stroke was 0.5%, increased 8 fold by post procedural hypertension.

The use of BB more than 30 days prior procedure was associated to a 34% reduction of stroke/death rate (OR 0.66; CI 95% 0.46-0.95; p<0.025).

Other predictors of stroke/death were age, diabetes, symptomatic lesions and post-procedural hypotension, whereas prior endarterectomy and the use of protection systems resulted protective.

Conclusion
Hypertension and hypotension that require treatment, are strongly associated with stroke and death after CAS. BB significantly reduce periprocedural stroke/death rates. To better assess the potential of these drugs in CAS calls for further prospective research.

Editorial Comment
This is a retrospective study but it includes a significant number of patients. It shows that a simple and low cost strategies can render considerable benefits in harsh events, in addition to experience and rigorous hemodynamic control, which are essential to achieve better results.

Further randomized studies are necessary to find out who will benefit most from the use of BB.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.
Interventional Cardiologist
Favaloro Foundation – Buenos Aires

More articles by this author

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...