Immediate vs. delayed intervention in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Original Title: Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Intervention for Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients The RIDDLE-NSTEMI Study (Randomized study of ImmeDiate versus DeLayedinvasivE intervention in patients with Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction). Reference: J Am CollCardiolIntv. 2016. Online before print.

 

This study assessed the clinical impact of immediate invasive intervention (within 2 hours) vs. delayed intervention (within 2 and 72 hrs.) in non ST myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients.

Prior studies have shown contradictory outcomes of the effect of early invasive intervention in heterogeneous populations of NSTEMI patients.

The study randomized 323 NSTEMI patients to immediate intervention (<2 hrs.after randomization, n=162) vs. delayed intervention (2 to 72 hrs.after randomization, n=161).Primary end point was death or new MI at 30 days.

Median time from randomization to angiography was 1.4 hrs. for the immediate intervention group and 61 hrs. for the delayed intervention group.

At 30 days, the primary end point of death and new MI was less frequent in the immediate intervention group (4.3% vs. 13%, HR 0.32, CI 95% 0.13 to 0.74; p= 0.008).

This difference in favor of immediate intervention persisted at one year (6.8% vs. 18.8%, HR 0.34, IC 95% 0.17 a 0.67; p=0.002).

The observed outcomes were mainly explained by a higher rate of new MI in the period between randomization and catheterization in the delayed intervention group (0 deaths and 0 new MIs in the immediate intervention group vs. 1 death and 10 new MIs in the delayed intervention group).

Death, new MI or recurrent ischemia rates were lower in the immediate intervention group, both at 30 days (6.8% vs. 26.7%; p < 0.001) and at 1 year (15.4% vs. 33.1%; p < 0.001).

Conclusion
The immediate invasive strategy in STEMI patients reduces mortality and new MI, compared to a delayed intervention strategy.

Editorial Comment
Prior studies have shown the potential of early interventions in NSTEMI syndromes, however, the advantage has always been based on softer end points such as recurrent ischemia. This work is the first to bring evidence on hard points such as death and MI.

More articles by this author

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...