Is normal FFR always good prognosis?

Original Title: Coronary Flow Reserve and Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients with Intermediate Coronary Stenosis. Reference: Joo Myung Lee, el al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67:1158-69

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) helps establish whether intermediate stenosis will generate ischemia, but it won’t help assess microcirculatory function. It has been shown that an alteration at that level generates ischemia and has a negative impact on evolution.

Patients presenting intermediate stenosis were analyzed by visual assessment (40%-70%) and FFR, coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) were measured in the same procedure.

Hyperemia was induced by intravenous infusion of adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) and FFR was an average of the three slowest cardiac cycles.
Cutoff values were ≤0.80 for FFR, ≤2 for CFR and ≥23U for IMRcorr .

Primary end point was a combination of all cause death, AMI and revascularization.

The study included 313 patients, 230 (73.5%) presenting FFR ≥0.80. These were divided into 4 groups: high CFR with low IMR, 61.3% (group A); high CFR with high IMR18.3% (B); low CFR with low IMR, 13.5% (C); low CFR with high IMR, 7% (D).

All 4 groups had similar clinical and angiographic characteristics.

Median follow up was 658 days and primary point incidence was 9.5%, 0%, 7% and 27.9% (p=0.002) for groups A, B, C and D respectively, a significantly higher events rate for the group with low CRF and high IMR (group D).

This was due to the higher rate of death, MI and revascularization; the latter was associated to a progression of stenoses documented by angiography and FFR.

Microvascular disease, multivessel disease and diabetes were primary end point predictors.

Conclusion
Coronary flow reserve and index of microcirculatory resistance improved risk stratification in patients with intermediate lesions and FFR≥0.80. Patients with low coronary flow reserve associated to a high index of microcirculatory resistance have better prognosis.

Commentary
At present, FFR is the “Gold Standard” for the functional assessment of coronary obstructions. This was shown in the FAME studies, where FFR≥0.80 stenoses had no impact in evolution at two years.

Microcirculatory alteration associated to intermediate stenoses documented by FFR presented more hard events and are associated to the progress of epicardial disease.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.
Interventional Cardilogist
Favaloro Foundation – Buenos Aires.

More articles by this author

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

QFR vs. FFR: Is Coronary Revascularization Deferral Safe? Results from a FAVOR III Sub-Analysis

In cases of intermediate coronary lesions, functional assessment is recommended to aid the decision-making process regarding revascularization. There are several tools currently used to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...