Could CT angiography replace coronary angiography in the short term?

Original Title: CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions. Head-to-Head Comparison with Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.

Reference: Matthew J. Budoff et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2016;9(5):559-564.

 

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive CT angiography and conventional quantitative coronary angiography to detect significant coronary stenoses against fractional flow reserve (FFR) as gold standard.

CT angiography is a non-invasive alternative to detect and rule out heart disease; however, it tends to overestimate lesions.

FFR was used as gold standard given its capacity to improve outcomes in guiding revascularization procedures.

A total 252 patients from 5 countries underwent CT and coronary angiography in 407 lesions.

Severity of lesions, according to CT and quantitative angiography, was classified between 0% and 29%, 30% and 49%, 50% and 69% and between 70% and 100%. All lesions ≥50% were automatically regarded as obstructive.

Functional significance of lesions was classified according to FFR 0.8 cutoff value, as usual.

According to FFR, out of the 407 lesions, 151 (37%) were functionally significant.

 

CT angiography

Diagnostic accuracy – 69%

Sensitivity – 79%

Specificity – 63%

Positive predictive value – 55%

Negative predictive value 83%

 

Quantitative angiography

Diagnostic accuracy – 71%

Sensitivity – 74%

Specificity – 70%

Positive predictive value – 59%

Negative predictive value 82%

 

The area under the curve to identify capacity to detect lesions that cause ischemia was similar, with 0.75 for CT angiography and 0.77 for quantitative coronary angiography (p = 0.6).

There were no differences when considering left anterior descending artery (0.71 vs. 0.73; p=0.6), left circumflex artery (0.78 vs. 0.85; p=0.4) and right coronary artery (0.80 vs. 0.83; p=0.6).

 

Conclusion

CT and conventional angiography have similar diagnostic capacity to detect lesion-specific ischemia.

 

Editorial Comment

CT angiography is a less invasive and safer diagnostic tool, and in some countries, less expensive than conventional angiography. On the other hand, it has the disadvantage of additional radiation and contrast doses, which cannot be solved with ad-hoc PCI, and may render it less useful in cases when the risk of heart disease is high.

More articles by this author

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

QFR vs. FFR: Is Coronary Revascularization Deferral Safe? Results from a FAVOR III Sub-Analysis

In cases of intermediate coronary lesions, functional assessment is recommended to aid the decision-making process regarding revascularization. There are several tools currently used to...

FRANCE TAVI Registry: Coronary Adverse Events After TAVI

Between 30% and 70% of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the prognostic impact of CAD in...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Prospective Analysis of the Feasibility of the PASCAL System for Transcatheter Mitral Repair: OneForAll Registry

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is an effective option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation who are at high...

Left Bundle Branch Block after TAVR: What Is Its Impact?

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), which can be either...