Anticoagulation and PCI: How Long Should Triple Therapy Last?

Anticoagulation post PCIThe aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes in relation to the duration of triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with indications for oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary angioplasty. The optimal period for the prescription of these three drugs has not been studied.

 

Between 2009 and 2013, 8772 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angioplasty were included in the Bern PCI Registry. Of 568 patients with indications for oral anticoagulation in the aforementioned registry, 245 (43%) were discharged on 1-month triple antithrombotic therapy and 323 (57%) on a regimen of over 1 month (mean 5.1 ± 3.3 months). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, definite stent thrombosis, or TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) major bleeding at 1 year.

 

Patients on a regime of 1-month triple antithrombotic therapy were more commonly clinically stable women with a higher risk of bleeding who received drug-eluting stents less frequently.

 

In the multivariate analysis, the primary endpoint turned out to be similar between groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56 to 2.06; p = 0.84). These results were consistent in stratified analyses according to clinical presentation and stent type.

 

There were no differences neither in the secondary endpoint bleeding, or in Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) ≥3 bleeding, nor in the ischemic secondary endpoint (cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or definite thrombosis).

 

 

Conclusion

In this observational study, as regards net clinical outcomes, a 1-month triple antithrombotic therapy was similar to longer triple antithrombotic therapy durations.

 

Original title: Duration of Triple Antithrombotic Therapy and Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Reference: Konstantinos C. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9(14):1473-1483.

 

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...