Percutaneous Device Closure of PVL: An Alternative to Surgery

leak paravalvularParavalvular Leak (PVL) occurs in 5 to 17% of patients undergoing surgical valve replacement. Percutaneous device closure of PVL represents an alternative to repeat surgery.

 

All centers in UK and Ireland performing percutaneous PVL closure delivered their data to the UK PVL registry. Data were analyzed for factors associated with mortality and major cardiovascular events at follow up.

 

There were 308 percutaneous PVL closure procedures in 259 patients between 2004 and 2015 in 20 centers. Population mean age was 67±13 years and 28% were women.

 

Main indication for percutaneous PVL closure was:

  • Cardiac failure, 80% of cases.
  • Hemolysis, 16% of cases.

 

Implantation was successful in 91% of patients via:

  • Transradial (7%)
  • Transfemoral arterial (52%)
  • Transfemoral venous (33%)
  • Transapical (7%)

 

19% of patients required reintervention.

 

Intervened valves were:

  • Mitral, 44%
  • Aortic, 48%.
  • Both, 2%.
  • Pulmonic, 0.4%.
  • TAVR, 5%.

 

Periprocedural leak was severe in 61% and multiple in 37% of cases, and improved significantly after procedure (p<0.001), disappearing in 33.3%, or becoming mild (41.4%) or moderate residual leak (18.6%).

 

Patient functional class also improved significantly at median 110 day follow up.

 

In hospital death was:

  • Elective cases, 2.9%.
  • Urgent cases, 6.8%.
  • Emergency procedures, 50%.

 

[plain]

At follow up, mortality resulted 16%, vascular surgery 6% and late device embolization 0.4%. The mitral valve was associated with more adverse events compared to the rest of the valves.

[/plain]

 

Factors independently associated with death were:

  • Degree of persistent leak (HR 2.87; p=0.037).
  • Functional class at follow up (HR 2.00; p=0.015).
  • Baseline creatinine (HR 8.19; P=0.001).

 

Conclusion

Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure is effective and improves leak severity and symptom severity. Post procedural residual leak severity is independently associated with adverse events and death. Percutaneous PVL closure must be considered an alternative to repeat surgery.

 

Original Title: Percutaneous Device Closure of Paravalvular Leak. Combined Experience From the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Reference: Patrick A. Calvert et al. Circulation. 2016 Sep 27; 134(13):934-44.

 

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, suggestions or questions here below.

More articles by this author

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Transapical TMVR in High Risk Patients: Intrepid 5-Year Outcomes

Moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) continues is still a high prevalence condition with bad prognosis, particularly among the elderly with left ventricular...

Impact of Balloon Post-Dilation on the Long-Term Durability of Bioprostheses after TAVR

Balloon post-dilation (BPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) allows for the optimization of prosthesis expansion and the reduction of residual paravalvular aortic regurgitation....

TAVR in Pure Native Aortic Regurgitation: Are Dedicated Devices Truly Superior?

This systematic meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with pure native aortic regurgitation. The emergence of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Endoleaks after endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: always reintervene or monitor with CTA?

Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms requiring sealing above the renal arteries, with preservation of visceral vessels using fenestrated and/or branched devices (F/B-EVAR), has become...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...