Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseThere are limited data on aspirin desensitization in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of a rapid desensitization protocol inpatients with a history of aspirin sensitivity about to receive PCI.

 

This was a prospective multicenter observational study, carried out in seven Italian centers including patients with a history of aspirin hypersensitivity in the context of a coronary angiogram and eventual PCI.

 

The study included an overall of 330 patients in said conditions with a history of CAD, suspected as a stable condition, and also patients undergoing ST elevation acute myocardial infarction.

 

Prior aspirin adverse events included:

  • urticaria (n=177, 53.6%),
  • angioedema (n=69, 20.9%),
  • asthma (n=65, 19.7%),
  • anaphylactic reaction (n=19, 5.8%).

 

Among those presenting urticaria/angioedema, 13 also has a history of chronic idiopathic urticaria.

 

The desensitization procedure was done before catheterization, with the exception of patients undergoing ST elevation AMI (n=78, 23.6%), who underwent the procedure after catheterization. In these last patients, the use of IIb/IIIa glycoprotein inhibitors was left to the operator’s criteria.

aspirine

 

Desensitization involved the oral administration of six sequential doses of aspirin (1, 5, 10, 20, 40 y 100 mg) during 5.5 hours. Aspirin administration was immediately interrupted whenever there were systemic, respiratory or mucocutaneoussigns of hypersensitivity. After desensitization, patients continued to take 100 mg aspirin per day. In all elective cases, the use of corticoids, antihistamine or anti leukotrienes was interrupted seven days after desensitization.

 

Of all patients, 71% (n=235) finally required PCI. The desensitization protocol was successful in 315 patients (95.4%) and all those with a history of anaphylactic reaction.

 

The 15 patients (4.6%) that did not respond to treatment only presented minor adverse reactions that were well managed with corticosteroids and antihistamines.

 

80% continued with aspirin for at least 12 months and those who decided to discontinue treatment did so because of medical decision, not because of adverse events.

 

Conclusion

Rapid desensitization protocol resulted safe and effective in a wide range of patients regardless the type of reaction to aspirin they used to have.

 

Original Title: Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Results of the Multicenter ADAPTED Registry (Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease).

Reference: Roberta Rossini et al. CircCardiovascInterv. 2017 Feb;10(2).


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....