Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseThere are limited data on aspirin desensitization in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to test the safety and efficacy of a rapid desensitization protocol inpatients with a history of aspirin sensitivity about to receive PCI.

 

This was a prospective multicenter observational study, carried out in seven Italian centers including patients with a history of aspirin hypersensitivity in the context of a coronary angiogram and eventual PCI.

 

The study included an overall of 330 patients in said conditions with a history of CAD, suspected as a stable condition, and also patients undergoing ST elevation acute myocardial infarction.

 

Prior aspirin adverse events included:

  • urticaria (n=177, 53.6%),
  • angioedema (n=69, 20.9%),
  • asthma (n=65, 19.7%),
  • anaphylactic reaction (n=19, 5.8%).

 

Among those presenting urticaria/angioedema, 13 also has a history of chronic idiopathic urticaria.

 

The desensitization procedure was done before catheterization, with the exception of patients undergoing ST elevation AMI (n=78, 23.6%), who underwent the procedure after catheterization. In these last patients, the use of IIb/IIIa glycoprotein inhibitors was left to the operator’s criteria.

aspirine

 

Desensitization involved the oral administration of six sequential doses of aspirin (1, 5, 10, 20, 40 y 100 mg) during 5.5 hours. Aspirin administration was immediately interrupted whenever there were systemic, respiratory or mucocutaneoussigns of hypersensitivity. After desensitization, patients continued to take 100 mg aspirin per day. In all elective cases, the use of corticoids, antihistamine or anti leukotrienes was interrupted seven days after desensitization.

 

Of all patients, 71% (n=235) finally required PCI. The desensitization protocol was successful in 315 patients (95.4%) and all those with a history of anaphylactic reaction.

 

The 15 patients (4.6%) that did not respond to treatment only presented minor adverse reactions that were well managed with corticosteroids and antihistamines.

 

80% continued with aspirin for at least 12 months and those who decided to discontinue treatment did so because of medical decision, not because of adverse events.

 

Conclusion

Rapid desensitization protocol resulted safe and effective in a wide range of patients regardless the type of reaction to aspirin they used to have.

 

Original Title: Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Results of the Multicenter ADAPTED Registry (Aspirin Desensitization in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease).

Reference: Roberta Rossini et al. CircCardiovascInterv. 2017 Feb;10(2).


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Spontaneous Left Main Dissection: Clinical Characteristics, management and Outcomes

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Spontaneous left main dissection in an uncommon, and potentially life-threatening, cause of acute MI. The aim of this study,...

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...