Bivalirudin reduces bleeding rate in carotid stenting

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava

bivalirudina-heparina-anticoagulantesBivalirudin has been shown to reduce bleeding in carotid stenting and maintain its efficacy. Even though carotid stenting has shown benefits, these remain unclear.

 

With this in mind, four studies were analyzed (one randomized) including 7,784 patients undergoing carotid stenting with unfractioned heparin vs. bivalirudin.

 

No difference was found between the groups across the different studies.

 

Bivalirudin was shown to reduce major bleeding rate with a relative risk (RR) of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.35-0.8; I2=0%) and minor bleeding RR of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.2-0.82; I2 =0%), with no difference in ischemic stroke, intracranial bleeding, infraction or mortality at 30 days.

 

Conclusion

Compared to unfractioned heparin, bivalirudin was associated with lower bleeding risk when used in carotid stenting.

 

Comment

The use of bivalirudin has shown this benefit in coronary PCI, but the transradial approach has also shown this benefit in PCI with unfractioned heparin.

 

In addition, bivalirudin significantly increases costs compared to unfractioned heparin.

 

Perhaps the use of the transradial approach (which several studies show as feasible and safe) neutralizes this benefit of bivalirudin, except for those cases that, for several reasons, should be done via femoral.  

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava

 

Original Title: Hemorrhagic and Ischemic Outcomes of Heparin vs. Bivalirudin in Carotid Artery Stenting: A Meta-analysis of Studies.

Reference: Jad Omran, et; al. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention 2017;88:746-753.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....