Bivalirudin reduces bleeding rate in carotid stenting

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava

bivalirudina-heparina-anticoagulantesBivalirudin has been shown to reduce bleeding in carotid stenting and maintain its efficacy. Even though carotid stenting has shown benefits, these remain unclear.

 

With this in mind, four studies were analyzed (one randomized) including 7,784 patients undergoing carotid stenting with unfractioned heparin vs. bivalirudin.

 

No difference was found between the groups across the different studies.

 

Bivalirudin was shown to reduce major bleeding rate with a relative risk (RR) of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.35-0.8; I2=0%) and minor bleeding RR of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.2-0.82; I2 =0%), with no difference in ischemic stroke, intracranial bleeding, infraction or mortality at 30 days.

 

Conclusion

Compared to unfractioned heparin, bivalirudin was associated with lower bleeding risk when used in carotid stenting.

 

Comment

The use of bivalirudin has shown this benefit in coronary PCI, but the transradial approach has also shown this benefit in PCI with unfractioned heparin.

 

In addition, bivalirudin significantly increases costs compared to unfractioned heparin.

 

Perhaps the use of the transradial approach (which several studies show as feasible and safe) neutralizes this benefit of bivalirudin, except for those cases that, for several reasons, should be done via femoral.  

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava

 

Original Title: Hemorrhagic and Ischemic Outcomes of Heparin vs. Bivalirudin in Carotid Artery Stenting: A Meta-analysis of Studies.

Reference: Jad Omran, et; al. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Intervention 2017;88:746-753.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...

OCT- and IVUS-Guided Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has reduced mortality in the acute phase. However, recurrent ACS and target vessel...