TOPIC: Benefits of Switching Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with ACS

Newer P2Y12 blockers are the front-line treatment and dual antiplatelet therapy is indicated for 1 year after acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Balancear el riesgo de sangrado vs trombótico para definir el tiempo de doble antiagregaciónBoth prasugrel and ticagrelor offer more ischemic benefit than clopidogrel during the initial phase; however, bleeding complications could increase in the long term. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of switching dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to a newer, “more powerful” combination including aspirin plus prasugrel or ticagrelor for the first month, followed by aspirin plus clopidogrel the next 11 months after ACS.

 

Patients enrolled presented ACS and had undergone angioplasty revascularization without ischemic or bleeding events within the first month after the ACS event.

 

They were randomized to switch DAPT (aspirin plus prasugrel or ticagrelor for 1 month, followed by aspirin plus clopidogrel the next 11 months) or continuation of their DAPT regimen (aspirin plus prasugrel or ticagrelor for 12 months). The primary endpoint was a composite of death, urgent revascularization, stroke, and ≥2 bleeding (as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] classification) at 1 year. The secondary endpoint was similar but included all BARC or TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) bleeding categories.

 

A total 646 patients with ACS who had undergone angioplasty were randomized. The primary endpoint was 52% lower among patients who switched DAPT after 1 month than among those who maintained the “powerful” regimen for 1 year (13.4% for switch DAPT at 1 month vs. 26.3% for unchanged DAPT throughout the year; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.34-0.68; p < 0,01).

 

No significant differences were reported on ischaemic endpoints, which were similar for both groups (9.3% vs. 11.5%, respectively; HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.50-1.29; p = 0.36), but, as expected, there was a 70% reduction in the rate of BARC ≥2 bleeding (4.0% vs. 14.9% at 1 year, respectively; HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.18-0.50; p < 0,01).

 

Conclusion

In patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome who required angioplasty and did not experience adverse events within 1 month, a switched DAPT from a powerful aspirin plus prasugrel or ticagrelor regimen to aspirin plus clopidogrel was superior to a whole year on aspirin plus prasugrel or ticagrelor, due to the significant reduction in bleeding events without an increase in ischemic events.

 

Dr. Thomas Cuisset
Dr. Thomas Cuisset

Original title: Benefit of Switched Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TOPIC (Timing Of Platelet Inhibition after acute Coronary Syndrome) Randomized Study.

Presenter: Thomas Cuisset.

 

 

CuissetThomas


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...