VIVA Post-Market Study: More Evidence for the Valve-in-Valve Technique

Courtesy of the SBHCI.

VIVA Post-Market Study: More Evidence for the Valve-in-Valve TechniqueBioprosthetic surgically-implanted valves degenerate over time, while patients become too old and are at high risk for reoperation.

 

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation inside a deteriorated surgically-implanted valve (a valve-in-valve procedure) is an emerging alternative.

 

The VIVA trial was designed to offer systematic and prospective data from patients treated with the valve-in-valve procedure in clinical practice with CoreValve and Evolut R devices.

 

This observational registry enrolled 202 patients (from 23 European sites) with symptomatic degeneration of a surgical bioprosthesis who were acceptable candidates for treatment with a self-expanding valve.

 

All of them were high-risk patients (EuroSCORE >20% or Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS] score >10%) or presented a contraindication for redo surgery.

 

The primary safety endpoint was cardiovascular death at 30 days post procedure, and the primary efficacy endpoint was a lack of significant aortic stenosis (mean gradient >40 mmHg) or moderate paravalvular insufficiency at over 1 year post procedure.

 

Of all patients, 97% were treated through a transfemoral approach, and 2% presented the primary safety endpoint.

 

The rate of stroke was 3%, 6.5% of patients experienced major cardiovascular complications, and 2% experienced moderate to severe paravalvular insufficiency.

 

Coronary occlusion is always a source of worry for this patient group; however, only 2% of VIVA patients experienced this complication, which is equal to almost half the incidence rates previously published.

 

Conclusion

The VIVA trial confirmed the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of valve-in-valve procedures using self-expanding CoreValve or Evolut R devices in patients with degenerated surgical bioprostheses.

 

Courtesy of the SBHCI.

 

Dr. Ran Kornowski
Dr. Ran Kornowski.

Original title: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses Using a Self-Expanding Device: Early Results from the Prospective VIVA Post-Market Study.

Presenter: Ran Kornowski.

 

 

KornowskiRan


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...