Angioplasty in lesions due to radiation treatment presents similar mortality rates

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Angioplasty in Lesions Due to Radiation Treatment Presents Similar Mortality RatesThoracic radiation causes cardiac lesions, and coronary arteries are among the most affected structures. Furthermore, it provokes obstructive lesions due to wall fibrosis. Generally, patients with this background are not eligible for surgery and receive angioplasty, a seemingly great alternative.

However, there is no clear information on outcomes yet.

 

This study included 116 patients who received thoracic radiation (XRT) for 5.6 years (1.1-12.3) before angioplasty. These were propensity matched against 408 control patients, to make the population more uniform.

 

No difference was observed as regards in-hospital results.

 

In the 6.3-year follow-up (4-9.8), there were no differences between groups in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.31; p = 0.078) and cardiac mortality (HR: 0.78; p = 0.49). Fifty-six patients died in the XRT group (12 cardiac deaths) and 159 patients died in the control group (44 cardiac deaths).

 

Conclusion

Patients with prior thoracic radiation and coronary disease treated with angioplasty had similar complications after the procedure when compared to control subjects. Furthermore, they both presented similar long term mortality rates.

 

Editorial Comment

This study adds important information as regards angioplasty in patients who received XRT. A primary concern in these cases is pericardial rupture and effusion, since these arteries are more fibrous and rigid. In that sense, the most important information provided by this analysis is that the procedure does not affect mortality.

 

However, the scope of this work is greatly limited by the fact that it does not provide information as regards the rate of restenosis or the presence of other events.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

Original title: Percutaneous Revascularization in Patientes Treated with Thoracic Radiaton for Cancer.

Reference: Erin Fender. Am Heart J 2017;187:98-103.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...