COMPASS: A New Place for Rivaroxaban in Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease

Combining low doses of rivaroxaban and aspirin seems to be the best strategy for patients with stable chronic ischemic heart disease, according to this new study presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress 2017, which was published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.

COMPASS: un nuevo lugar para el rivaroxaban en cardiopatía isquémica crónica

Compared with low-dose aspirin alone, the combination of aspirin and rivaroxaban reduced the primary endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke through a follow-up of 2 years (4.1% vs. 5.4%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.86).

 

This came at the obvious cost of significantly increased major bleeding (3.1% vs. 1.9%; HR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.40-2.05). However, net clinical benefit still favors the rivaroxaban-aspirin combination.


Read also: “Ad Hoc” PCI during TAVR: No Impact on Safety or Long Term Outcomes”.


The COMPASS study was conducted at 602 centers in 33 countries and includes 27,395 patients with coronary disease, peripheral vascular disease, or both. These subjects were randomized to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily, rivaroxaban 5.0 mg twice-daily alone, or aspirin 100 mg once-daily alone. Patients who were not under treatment with a proton pump inhibitor were also randomized to pantoprazole or placebo.

 

In addition to the benefit observed as regards the primary endpoint, the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin reduced the rates of other study endpoints, such as ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, acute lower limb ischemia, or death from coronary causes.


Read also: Pacemaker Implantation After TAVI Raises Costs But Not the Incidence of Adverse Events”.


Rivaroxaban monotherapy did not exhibit any advantages over aspirin alone.

 

Original title: Rivaroxaban With or Without Aspirin in Stable Cardiovascular Disease.

Presenter: Eikelboom JW.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...