COMPASS: A New Place for Rivaroxaban in Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease

Combining low doses of rivaroxaban and aspirin seems to be the best strategy for patients with stable chronic ischemic heart disease, according to this new study presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress 2017, which was published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.

COMPASS: un nuevo lugar para el rivaroxaban en cardiopatía isquémica crónica

Compared with low-dose aspirin alone, the combination of aspirin and rivaroxaban reduced the primary endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke through a follow-up of 2 years (4.1% vs. 5.4%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.86).

 

This came at the obvious cost of significantly increased major bleeding (3.1% vs. 1.9%; HR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.40-2.05). However, net clinical benefit still favors the rivaroxaban-aspirin combination.


Read also: “Ad Hoc” PCI during TAVR: No Impact on Safety or Long Term Outcomes”.


The COMPASS study was conducted at 602 centers in 33 countries and includes 27,395 patients with coronary disease, peripheral vascular disease, or both. These subjects were randomized to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg once daily, rivaroxaban 5.0 mg twice-daily alone, or aspirin 100 mg once-daily alone. Patients who were not under treatment with a proton pump inhibitor were also randomized to pantoprazole or placebo.

 

In addition to the benefit observed as regards the primary endpoint, the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin reduced the rates of other study endpoints, such as ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, acute lower limb ischemia, or death from coronary causes.


Read also: Pacemaker Implantation After TAVI Raises Costs But Not the Incidence of Adverse Events”.


Rivaroxaban monotherapy did not exhibit any advantages over aspirin alone.

 

Original title: Rivaroxaban With or Without Aspirin in Stable Cardiovascular Disease.

Presenter: Eikelboom JW.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

ACC 2026 | FAST III: vFFR vs FFR in physiology-guided revascularization of intermediate coronary lesions

Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions remains a cornerstone in decision-making for coronary revascularization. Although FFR continues to be one of the guideline-recommended references,...