Introducing the number one enemy of PCI: diabetes

About 25% of patients with multivessel disease undergoing myocardial revascularization surgery or PCI have diabetes.

 

In this subgroup, the benefit of surgery in terms of mortality has long been shown: in the BARI study (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation) patients undergoing PCI had close to double the mortality rate at 5 years compared to those undergoing surgery, and in the more recent FREEDOM study (Future Revascularization Evaluation in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus) a reduction of combined events was also observed in favor of surgery. Finally, the diabetic patient subgroup of the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) also benefited from surgery with lower mortality.

 

Given all this evidence, guidelines recommend surgery to treat diabetic patients with multivessel disease. The problem is not all diabetics are the same and the vast majority of patients enrolled in previous studies had diabetes type 2.


Read also: Additional Benefit from Radial Artery Graft in Myocardial Revascularization Surgery”.


Diabetes type can be relevant, bearing in mind that diabetes type 1 has relatively bad prognosis post-surgery. Instead, patients with type 2 diabetes have a prognosis post-surgery fairly similar to that of non-diabetic patients.

 

This study intended to study type 1 diabetics with multivessel disease to find the best revascularization strategy for this group of patients.

 

It included 683 type 1 diabetes with multivessel disease undergoing PCI or CABG with a 10.6 year follow up. This population was taken from the SWEDEHEART registry.


Read Also: CLOSE Trial: Patients with PFO with high flow or associated with interatrial septal aneurysm receiving closure device experience lower rates of recurrent stroke”.


In this period, 53% of patients in the surgery group and 45% in the PCI group had died, thus death resulting similar in both groups. However, when looking at coronary death, AMI and new revascularization, there was a clear benefit in favor of surgery.

 

Conclusion

Myocardial revascularization surgery showed benefits in terms of coronary death, acute myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization in diabetes type 1 patients with multivessel disease.

 

Editorial Comment

The observational nature of this study is its greatest limitation, since there is a significant difference between patients undergoing one or the other revascularization strategy (regardless adjustments). Many patients in the PCI group were too sick to go to surgery, which was seen in the prior rates of stroke, cardiac failure, active cancer, and terminal kidney failure, among others.

Despite its limitations, this is the biggest cohort of type 1 diabetics with multivessel disease followed for more than 10 years, which is why surgery will continue to be the gold standard for this patients in years to come.  

 

Original title: PCI Versus CABG in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes and Multivessel Disease.

Reference: Thomas Nyström et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017. Article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

QFR vs. FFR: Is Coronary Revascularization Deferral Safe? Results from a FAVOR III Sub-Analysis

In cases of intermediate coronary lesions, functional assessment is recommended to aid the decision-making process regarding revascularization. There are several tools currently used to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...