Peri-Procedural Infarction: More Frequent than and Not as Innocent as We Thought

Almost 30% of all patients experience some degree of myocardial injury after elective angioplasty, a statistic associated to an increase in cardiovascular events at 30 days and 1 year, according to this study recently published in Eur Heart J.

infarto peri-procedimientoThe study only included consecutive patients who underwent elective angioplasty with a negative troponin level at admission. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of peri-procedural infarction (type 4a infarction), stent thrombosis (type 4b), and myocardial injury according to the third universal definition of infarction.

Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of infarction and myocardial injury, and their relation to 30-day and 1-year events.


Read also: ACC 2018 | SECURE-PCI: High Dose of Statins pior PCI Could Help.


Among 1390 patients who underwent elective angioplasty, the primary endpoint was observed in 28.7% of cases, including 7.0% of type 4a infarction, 0.14% of type 4b infarction, and 21.6% of myocardial injury.

Independent risk factors were left main disease, total stent length >30 mm, multiple stenting, chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min), and age >75 years old.

At 30 days, patients with peri-procedural infarction or myocardial injury had a higher rate of cardiovascular events (5.5% vs. 1.2%; p < 0.001), which was mainly driven by ischemic events (3.2% vs. 0.6%; p < 0.0001).


Read also: Surgery Seems Superior to Angioplasty in Young Patients.


At 1 year, the risk of events remained higher for patients with peri-procedural infarction or myocardial injury (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

Peri-procedural infarction and myocardial injury are frequent complications of elective angioplasty and are associated with an increase in cardiovascular events at 30 days and 1 year.

Original title: Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Injury in Elective Coronary Stenting.

Reference: Michel Zeitouni et al. Eur Heart J. 2018 Apr 1;39(13):1100-1109.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...