What Happens with Small Dissections and Imperfections Only Shown by OCT?

When we carry out an angioplasty guided by angiography alone, as we historically have, we are almost blind. Nowadays, optical coherence tomography (OCT) offers plenty of detail but also raises costs, procedure time, and contrast volume. The question that this study aimed to answer is whether becoming aware of all small defects and imperfections in stent implantation, which are invisible to conventional angiography, is actually worth it. That is to say, the question was whether the impact of OCT-defined suboptimal stent implantation at long-term follow-up could be assessed.

stentSuch was the context for the Centro per la Lotta contro l’Infarto – Optimisation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) registry, which compared the long-term outcome of angioplasty in 1211 patients from 13 independent OCT-experienced sites according to end-procedural OCT findings.

 

OCT assessment revealed suboptimal stent implantation in 30.9% (!) of lesions, which entails an increase in patients experiencing device-related events (52.8% vs. 28.0%, p <0,001).


Read also: OCT Follow-Up of Plaque Erosion with Medical Therapy and Without Stenting.


At a mean follow-up of 833 days, minimum lumen area <4.5 mm² (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.82; p < 0.001), distal stent edge dissection >200 µm (HR: 2.03; p = 0.004), and reference vessel plaque and lumen area <4.5 mm² at both the distal (HR: 5.22; p < 0.001) or proximal (HR: 5.67; p < 0.001) stent edges were independent predictors of stent failure.

 

Against all odds, other factors such as MLA/reference lumen area <70%, strut malapposition, and plaque protrusion or in-stent thrombus did not predict events.

 

Conclusion

Suboptimal stent implantation, defined according to specific OCT-defined criteria, predicts long-term events. However, other factors that were presumed predictors due to logical thinking and apparently supporting evidence were discarded as such. The quintessential example of this is probably acute stent malapposition.

 

Original title: Long-Term Consequences of Optical Coherence Tomography Findings During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Centro Per La Lotta Contro L’infarto – Optimization Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) LATE Study.

Reference: Francesco Prati et al. EuroIntervention 2018;14:e443-e451.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...