TCT 2018 | TALENT: Ultrathin Struts and Bioresorbable Polymer at the Lowest Possible Cost

This study assessed the Ultra-thin Strut Bioresorbable Polymer-based Coronary DES (Supraflex) against the Xience, with special emphasis in the cost-benefit ratio.  

TCT 2018 | TALENT: struts ultrafinos y polímero bioabsorbible al menor costo posibleIt included a population of 1435 all-comers from 23 centers in 7 European countries, randomized 1:1 (720 Supraflex and 715 Xience). Primary end point was a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and clinically justified revascularization with a non-inferiority analysis.

 

Primary end point occurred in 4.9% of patients in the Supraflex group vs 5.3% in the Xience group (p=0.80), reaching a non-inferiority margin. There were no differences when looking at primary end point components separately such as death or infarction, but there was a reduction of repeat revascularization in the Xience group.


Read also: TCT 2018 | SORT OUT IX: Polymer-Free DES with Ultra-Thin Struts vs. Bioresorbable Polymer- Based DES.


No stent was able to cross the lesion in 2% with Supraflex vs only 0.1% with Xience (p<0.001), which tilted the scales as regards device success rate (97.6% vs 99.5%; p=0.003).

 

The Xience continues to be the gold standard to compare against when it comes to assessing new devices. However, in this particular case, the Suprafex has a unique advantage: its low cost. While for most countries any DES is around USD 1800, the Supraflex only costs USD 440, which makes it an attractive alternative.

 

Original title: A Randomized Trial Evaluating an Ultra-Thin Strut Bioresorbable Polymer-Based Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent in An All-Comers Patient Population.

Presenter: Prof. Dr. Patrick.W. Serruys.

Talent-presentacion


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....