Safety of Lesion Deferral with iFR or FFR in Both Stable and Acute Patients

Overall, deferral of lesion revascularization is equally safe with both fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), with a low rate of events of about 4%. Lesions were more frequently deferred when iFR (as opposed to FFR) was used for functional assessment. Among patients with deferred lesions, acute patients experienced significantly more events than stable chronic patients.

Nuevo dispositivo para medición del FFR permite cruzar la lesión con nuestra guía preferidaThis study analyzed the safety of lesion deferral in the randomized populations (n = 4486) of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularisation) and iFR-SWEDEHEART (Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris or Acute Coronary Syndrome) trials.

 

Patients were stratified according to whether the revascularization decision was made on the basis of iFR or FFR and to clinical presentation (acute coronary syndrome and stable chronic disease).


Read also: Predictors of Conduction Disturbances Requiring a Late Permanent Pacemaker.


The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse events (all-cause death, non-fatal infarction, and unplanned revascularization at one year).

 

Coronary revascularization was deferred in 2130 total patients: 1117 patients (50%) in the iFR group and 1013 patients (45%) in the FFR group (p < 0.01).


Read also: Ambulatory Continuous Monitoring in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block After TAVI.


At 1 year, the rate of events in the population with deferred vessels was similar between the iFR and FFR groups (4.12% vs. 4.05%; p = 0.6). Among the deferred population, clinical presentation as acute coronary syndrome was associated with more events compared with chronic stable patients (5.91% vs. 3.64%; p = 0.04).

 

Conclusion

Deferral of revascularization is equally safe with both iFR and FFR, with a low event rate of around 4%. Lesions were more commonly deferred when iFR was used. After lesion deferral, patients with an acute coronary syndrome experienced more combined events than patients with stable chronic angina.

 

Original title: Safety of the Deferral of Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Reference: Javier Escaned et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2018; 11:1437-49.

 

2018-10-18-1437abierto.full


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...