“Troponinitis” or “Troponinemia”: Terms that Trivialize Troponin Elevation Without a Specified Diagnosis

Troponin elevation is a common finding in acute patients admitted by an emergency service, even in the absence of an acute coronary event. There are patients in whom we simply cannot identify the origin of such troponin elevation. Initially, we relied on this marker as an exclusive marker of acute coronary syndrome. In consequence, many patients with troponin elevation sooner or later ended up in the cath lab, despite their inconclusive electrocardiograms and signs and symptoms of other diseases.

DETO2X-AMI: el O2 suplementario no aporta beneficios en pacientes con sospecha de infartoWe have encountered so many normal coronary arteries in this setting that somewhere along the line we popularized the terms “troponitis” and “troponinemia”.

 

This study aimed to investigate the association between troponin elevation and long-term clinical prognosis in acute patients admitted in the emergency room with suspected acute coronary syndrome, who were ultimately discharged without a specified diagnosis.


Read also: The Physiopathology Behind Valve Degeneration in TAVR.


This study analyzed retrospectively the 48,872-patient cohort from the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) study. Patients were stratified according to their troponin levels into cohorts with troponin levels less than or equal to the cutoff (99th percentile), and all levels above the cutoff were separated by tertiles.

 

Positive troponin levels were identified in 20.1% of patients (n = 9800). As expected, the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors as well as noncardiovascular comorbidities increased across higher tertiles.


Read also: Bundle Branch Block and Need for Permanent Pacemaker, a Major Challenge after TAVR.


In total, 15.4% of such patients with positive troponin levels who were discharged from their index hospitalization without a specified diagnosis had more events (cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, readmission for heart failure, or stroke) over a mean follow-up of almost 5 years.

 

Conclusion

Troponin elevation is associated with cardiovascular and noncardiovascular comorbidities, and it predicts future events in acutely admitted patients, in whom no definite diagnosis could be established during their index hospitalization. The terms “troponinitis” and “troponinemia” trivialize the prognostic value of this marker and should be avoided, even if we cannot explain this phenomenon.

 

Original title: Cardiac Troponin Elevation in Patients Without a Specific Diagnosis.

Reference: Kai M. Eggers et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:1-9.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...