ESC 2019 | PARAGON-HF: Sacubitril/Valsartan Somewhat Disappointing, though a Few Would Benefit.

The combination Sacubitril/valsartan did not reduce the risk of rehospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death in patients with cardiac failure symptoms and preserved ejection fraction, according to the new study presented on Sunday at ESC 2019 scientific session in Paris and simultaneously published in NEJM.

Despite the negative results, we remain hopeful that this drug could bridge the gap in the treatment of this population on the rise.

After a mean 3 year follow up, primary end point rate every 100 patients/year was 12.8 with valsartan/sacubritil vs. 14.6 for valsartan alone (RR 0.87, CI 95% 0.75 to 1.01). A favorable trend, but with no significance.


Read also: ESC 2019 | THEMIS: Ticagrelor in Diabetics with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.


Secondary end points, of exploratory nature, showed improved functional class and quality of life together with lower chance of kidney function deterioration with the sacubitril/valsartan combination.

At sub-group analysis, it seems to have a special benefit in women. This does not come as a surprise since it is women who most frequently present cardiac failure with preserved function.

This drug combination has been approved for patients with chronic cardiac failure with reduced ejection fraction (40% or lower) based on the PARADIGM-HF outcomes. In this study, the combination sacubritil/valsartan was indeed capable of reducing cardiovascular death rate and rehospitalization for cardiac failure.

Despite the PARAGON-HF outcomes, we should not lose hope on the benefit of these drugs for patients with preserved function, seeing as no drugs have been proved effective in this context.

Original title: Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Reference: Solomon SD et al. N Engl J Med. 2019; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...