ESC 2019 | PARAGON-HF: Sacubitril/Valsartan Somewhat Disappointing, though a Few Would Benefit.

The combination Sacubitril/valsartan did not reduce the risk of rehospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death in patients with cardiac failure symptoms and preserved ejection fraction, according to the new study presented on Sunday at ESC 2019 scientific session in Paris and simultaneously published in NEJM.

Despite the negative results, we remain hopeful that this drug could bridge the gap in the treatment of this population on the rise.

After a mean 3 year follow up, primary end point rate every 100 patients/year was 12.8 with valsartan/sacubritil vs. 14.6 for valsartan alone (RR 0.87, CI 95% 0.75 to 1.01). A favorable trend, but with no significance.


Read also: ESC 2019 | THEMIS: Ticagrelor in Diabetics with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.


Secondary end points, of exploratory nature, showed improved functional class and quality of life together with lower chance of kidney function deterioration with the sacubitril/valsartan combination.

At sub-group analysis, it seems to have a special benefit in women. This does not come as a surprise since it is women who most frequently present cardiac failure with preserved function.

This drug combination has been approved for patients with chronic cardiac failure with reduced ejection fraction (40% or lower) based on the PARADIGM-HF outcomes. In this study, the combination sacubritil/valsartan was indeed capable of reducing cardiovascular death rate and rehospitalization for cardiac failure.

Despite the PARAGON-HF outcomes, we should not lose hope on the benefit of these drugs for patients with preserved function, seeing as no drugs have been proved effective in this context.

Original title: Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Reference: Solomon SD et al. N Engl J Med. 2019; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

ACC 2026 | FAST III: vFFR vs FFR in physiology-guided revascularization of intermediate coronary lesions

Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions remains a cornerstone in decision-making for coronary revascularization. Although FFR continues to be one of the guideline-recommended references,...