TCT 2019 | EURO-CTO: Results at 3 Years of CTO Recanalization vs. Optimal Medical Treatment

Courtesy of SBHCI.

Between 16 and 18% of coronary artery lesions in patients with chronic stable CAD are chronic total occlusions (CTO). CTO revascularization could benefit symptomatic patients, but it remains unclear whether such complex procedure is safe in the long run, given the study outcomes on PCI in CAD so far. 

Highlights TCT 2019

This study presented at the scientific sessions of TCT 2019 randomized multivessel patients with at least one CTO to DES stenting on severe lesions and further functional ischemia assessment vs. optimal medical treatment. 

The study included 407 patients from 26 centers and 8 countries to recanalization plus optimal medical treatment (OMT) (n=259) vs OMT alone (n=137). Both successful CTO intervention + OMT and OMT alone patients were assessed with a functional test at 12 and 36 months. 

There were no differences in hard end points (infarction or death) between the groups, but patients with successful recanalization did present better quality of life, less frequent angina, better functional class and less physical limitation. 

18.2% of OMT patients and 7.3% of PCI + OMT patients needed new ischemia driven revascularization after 3 years. 

Conclusion

This study is the first to show a benefit of PCI over OMT in symptomatic CTO patients. There was significant event reduction in the PCI group basically driven by symptom improvement and better rate of re

Courtesy of SBHCI.

Link to the SBHCI publication HERE

Original Title: EURO-CTO: 3-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of PCI vs. Medical Therapy in Patients With Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions.

Author of the Original Article: Gerald S. Werner.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...