Hours of Sleep and Myocardial Infarction Risk

This is one of the first studies to prospectively assess this association, and its outcomes support the idea that poor sleep is a potential MI risk factor. 

Cantidad de horas de sueño y riesgo de infarto de miocardio

Even though we need further data to be able to modify the current sleep duration standards as part of life-style change recommendations, it seems reasonable to start bearing this in mind.

Prior observational studies have associated extremes of sleep duration (both little and too much sleep) with MI risk, but confounders have made it hard to reach a definite conclusion. 

This study assessed 461347 participants free of heart disease, classified into three groups according to reported average sleep duration (short sleep <6 hours, between 6 and 9 hours and long sleep >9 hours). Multiple confounders were assessed, even a genetic disposition for heart disease. 


Read also: Dietary Supplements and Diets Show No Impact on Cardiovascular Risk.


Compared against individuals sleeping between 6 and 9 hours, those reporting short sleep had 20% higher MI risk after adjusting for multiple variables (HR: 1.20; CI 95%: 1.07 to 1.33) and those reporting long sleep had 34% higher risk of MI (HR: 1.34; CI 95%: 1.13 to 1.58).

Conclusion

This prospective study looking at sleep duration and MI risk showed a significant association between the two in people sleeping both short and long hours. More data are needed for us to be able to make recommendations to patients as part of a prevention strategy.

Original title: Sleep Duration and Myocardial Infarction.

Reference: Iyas Daghlas et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:1304–14.



Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...