ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Time of COVID-19

This study cites the experience of 6 sites during the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York. All patients included had a confirmed diagnosis of coronavirus infection and also ST-segment elevation on electrocardiography.

Eighteen patients met these criteria. We are used to large randomized studies; consequently, this small registry of less than 20 people seems to fall short, but it is all we have so far.

The mean age for the studied subjects was 63 years old and most patients were male. Only a third of this group experienced chest pain along the ST-segment elevation.

Half the patients admitted with COVID-19 symptoms had ST-segment elevation in the initial electrocardiography, while all others developed it during hospitalization.

Half the group (9 patients) ended up in the cath lab; 6 patients had obstructive lesions and 5 underwent angioplasty.


Read also: Procedural Rescheduling Criteria in the Pandemic Era.


About half these patients had a “conventional” ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; the other half experienced myocardial injury without any associated coronary disease.

Most included patients (72%) passed away at the hospital (4 patients with coronary disease and 9 with myocardial injury without coronary lesions).

In this series of patients affected by the new coronavirus and ST-segment elevation, there was a high prevalence of nonobstructive disease and a high mortality rate.


Read also: Reperfusion in the Time of COVID-19. What Has Changed?


Myocardial injuries in patients with COVID-19 may result from plaque rupture, cytokine storm, hypoxic injury, coronary spasm, microthrombi, or direct endothelial injury.

All patients had interstitial edema on magnetic resonance imaging.

10-1056-NEJMc2009020

Original Title: ST-Segment Elevation in Patients with Covid-19 — A Case Series.

Reference: Sripal Bangalore et al. The New England Journal of Medicine, article in press.   


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...