Plaque Volume Over Stenosis Degree

Paradigms are bound to eventually change. After years blinded by stenosis degree, plaque volume has proven to be a better predictor of cardiovascular events and death. Thus, patients with similar degrees of atherosclerosis burden have a similar prognosis, regardless of their lesions being obstructive or not.

El volumen de placa por sobre el grado de estenosis

The aim of this work was to assess whether obstructive disease has an additional predictive value beyond its association with the total number of calcified atherosclerotic lesions evaluated by tomography.

This analysis, recently published in JACC, included 23,759 symptomatic patients diagnosed by angiography. Major cardiovascular events (infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality) were stratified by atherosclerotic burden and number of affected vessels.

After a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 1054 patients experienced their first cardiovascular event. The event rate increased with both higher calcium scores and higher number of affected vessels. With a calcium score of 0, the event rate was 6.2 patients per 1000, while a >1000 score indicated a risk of 42.3 patients per 1000.

Having 1 affected vessel provided a similar risk of events than a calcium score of 0 (6.1 patients per 1000), while having all 3 vessels affected was not as severe as a calcium score >1000 (34.7 patients per 1000).


Read also: Sapien 3 Performs Well in “Jobs” for Which It Is Not Designed.


After stratifying patients into 5 groups according to their calcium score (0, 1-99, 100-399, 400-1000, and >1000), the presence of obstructive disease was not associated with a higher risk when compared with patients without obstructive disease.

Conclusion

Plaque volume, and not stenosis per se, is the best predictor for cardiovascular events and death.

j-jacc-2020-10-021free

Original title: Impact of Plaque Burden Versus Stenosis on Ischemic Events in Patients With Coronary Atherosclerosis.

Reference: Martin Bødtker Mortensen et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:2803–13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.021.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...