High Risk Anatomy Challenges ISCHEMIA Outcomes

According to this recent analysis published in JAHA, patients with stable Ischemic heart disease and high-risk anatomy benefit from revascularization at long term vs. the conservative treatment. 

Ischemia

This goes against the study presented by Reynolds H et al at AHA 2020. Dr. Reynold’s was a sub-study of the ISCHEMIA trial which had observed that even though anatomical complexity impacts prognosis, it cannot be modified by revascularization. 

The ISCHEMIA, published in NEJM, and all its sub studies, came to question everything we used to believe about chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy.  However, more and more studies shed light on the recommended strategies. 

9016 patients with stable ischemic heart disease and high-risk anatomy where included (3 vessels with >70% lesion, left main with >50% lesion or a combination of both).

The primary end point of all cause death or acute myocardial infarction was compared between patients receiving revascularization and those treated conservatively.


Read also: Diabetes and Peripheral Vascular Disease: Old Drugs, New Evidence.


5487 (61%) of patients received CABG (n=3312) or PCI (n=2175), whereas the remaining 3529 (39%) were managed conservatively.

Revascularization was associated with reduced MI rate and all cause rate. In addition, it was associated with longer life expectancy compared against the conservative treatment (p<0.001 for all points). 

Reduced events rate was similar between CABG (HR 0.64, CI 95% 0.59 to 0.70, p<0.001) and PCI (HR 0.61; CI 95% 0.57 to 0.66; p<0.001).

Conclusion

Revascularization in patient with stable ischemic heart disease and high-risk anatomy improves prognosis at long term compared against the conservative treatment. Coronary anatomy should be considered before recommending revascularization to treat these patients. 

JAHA-120-018104

Original Title: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Revascularization in High-Risk Coronary Anatomy Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

Reference: Kevin R. Bainey et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e018104.  DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018104.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...