High Risk Anatomy Challenges ISCHEMIA Outcomes

According to this recent analysis published in JAHA, patients with stable Ischemic heart disease and high-risk anatomy benefit from revascularization at long term vs. the conservative treatment. 

Ischemia

This goes against the study presented by Reynolds H et al at AHA 2020. Dr. Reynold’s was a sub-study of the ISCHEMIA trial which had observed that even though anatomical complexity impacts prognosis, it cannot be modified by revascularization. 

The ISCHEMIA, published in NEJM, and all its sub studies, came to question everything we used to believe about chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy.  However, more and more studies shed light on the recommended strategies. 

9016 patients with stable ischemic heart disease and high-risk anatomy where included (3 vessels with >70% lesion, left main with >50% lesion or a combination of both).

The primary end point of all cause death or acute myocardial infarction was compared between patients receiving revascularization and those treated conservatively.


Read also: Diabetes and Peripheral Vascular Disease: Old Drugs, New Evidence.


5487 (61%) of patients received CABG (n=3312) or PCI (n=2175), whereas the remaining 3529 (39%) were managed conservatively.

Revascularization was associated with reduced MI rate and all cause rate. In addition, it was associated with longer life expectancy compared against the conservative treatment (p<0.001 for all points). 

Reduced events rate was similar between CABG (HR 0.64, CI 95% 0.59 to 0.70, p<0.001) and PCI (HR 0.61; CI 95% 0.57 to 0.66; p<0.001).

Conclusion

Revascularization in patient with stable ischemic heart disease and high-risk anatomy improves prognosis at long term compared against the conservative treatment. Coronary anatomy should be considered before recommending revascularization to treat these patients. 

JAHA-120-018104

Original Title: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Revascularization in High-Risk Coronary Anatomy Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

Reference: Kevin R. Bainey et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e018104.  DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018104.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...