ACC 2021 | ATLANTIS: Apixaban After TAVR vs. Standard of Care

Adding apixaban to the treatment of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was non-superior to standard antithrombotic treatment, according to the randomized ATLANTIS trial presented today at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) 2021 Congress.

ACC 2021 | ATLANTIS: Apixaban post TAVI vs tratamiento estándar

Given its easy indication and good safety profile, it could be an option to vitamin K antagonists for patients with an indication for anticoagulation (e.g., atrial fibrillation). However, it does not seem to provide any additional benefit to the general population who undergoes TAVR.

This work yielded results that are in line with those of the GALILEO study with rivaroxaban. Neither offers a clear advantage nor presents any safety issues in terms of bleeding either.

Currently, simple antiplatelet therapy should be the standard therapy after TAVR for patients without any indication for double antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation.

The ATLANTIS trial included 1510 patients who underwent TAVR and were stratified according to whether they were indicated an anticoagulant agent or not.

Patients were randomized to apixaban 5 mg twice a day vs. the standard of care (vitamin K antagonists) for those with an indication for anticoagulant agents, and apixaban 5 mg twice a day vs. the standard of care (antiplatelet agents) for those without an indication for anticoagulant agents.


Read also: ACC 2021 | ADAPTABLE: Low Doses of Aspirin Are Equally Effective and Present Lower Bleeding Risk.


The primary endpoint was a composite of death, stroke, systemic embolism, intracardiac or prosthesis thrombosis, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or major bleeding at a one-year follow-up. Such endpoint was similar between the apixaban arm and both standard of care arms.

More cases of prosthesis thrombosis were observed in the standard of care arm vs. apixaban (1.1% vs. 4.7%; hazard ratio: 0.23; 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.50). This was observed more specifically in patients without an indication for anticoagulation.

Safety was good and comparable between arms, with an 8.5-% rate of major, disabling, or life-threatening bleeding.

Original Title: Oral anti-Xa anticoagulation after trans-aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis: the randomized ATLANTIS trial.

Reference: Collet J-P et al. Presentado en el congreso de la ACC 2021.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...