AHA 2021 | RAPID CABG: Safety of Early Surgical Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Suspending ticagrelor a couple of days before surgery was non-inferior to waiting 5-6 days in terms of bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring myocardial revascularization surgery. Patients who waited longer had more ischemic events and longer hospitalizations.

AHA 2021 | RAPID CABG: seguridad de ir al quirófano precozmente en un síndrome coronario agudo

Current American guidelines recommend waiting at least 5 days before operating on patients with ACS who received ticagrelor when admitted, while European guidelines recommend only 3 days.

RAPID CABG included 143 patients with ACS (93% of them with multivessel disease) for whom surgery was considered the most adequate strategy. Patients were randomized to undergo surgery between 2-3 days vs. 5-7 days after interrupting ticagrelor.

Mean time-to-surgery was 3 and 6 days in the early and delay arms, respectively.

The primary endpoint, severe bleeding (BARC 3/4), was similar between groups (4.6% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.0253), meaning the early strategy reached non-inferiority.

No patient in the early arm presented recurrent angina during the 2 days of waiting. Something very different occurred in the arm with the longer wait. There were 8.7% of patients with ischemic events, including an infarction.


Read also: AHA 2021 | AVATAR: Early Intervention in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.


Hospitalization length was also shorter in the early surgery arm (9 vs. 12 days).

Original Title: A randomized study of early vs. delayed coronary artery bypass surgery among patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with ticagrelor: the RAPID CABG study.

Reference: So DYF et al. Presentado durante las sesiones científicas del AHA 2021.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation with a Self-Expanding Valve: Outcomes at 3 Years

Pulmonary regurgitation (PR) is a common condition in patients who have undergone surgical repair of Tetralogy of Fallot or other pathologies involving the right...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...