AHA 2021 | RAPID CABG: Safety of Early Surgical Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Suspending ticagrelor a couple of days before surgery was non-inferior to waiting 5-6 days in terms of bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring myocardial revascularization surgery. Patients who waited longer had more ischemic events and longer hospitalizations.

AHA 2021 | RAPID CABG: seguridad de ir al quirófano precozmente en un síndrome coronario agudo

Current American guidelines recommend waiting at least 5 days before operating on patients with ACS who received ticagrelor when admitted, while European guidelines recommend only 3 days.

RAPID CABG included 143 patients with ACS (93% of them with multivessel disease) for whom surgery was considered the most adequate strategy. Patients were randomized to undergo surgery between 2-3 days vs. 5-7 days after interrupting ticagrelor.

Mean time-to-surgery was 3 and 6 days in the early and delay arms, respectively.

The primary endpoint, severe bleeding (BARC 3/4), was similar between groups (4.6% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.0253), meaning the early strategy reached non-inferiority.

No patient in the early arm presented recurrent angina during the 2 days of waiting. Something very different occurred in the arm with the longer wait. There were 8.7% of patients with ischemic events, including an infarction.


Read also: AHA 2021 | AVATAR: Early Intervention in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.


Hospitalization length was also shorter in the early surgery arm (9 vs. 12 days).

Original Title: A randomized study of early vs. delayed coronary artery bypass surgery among patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with ticagrelor: the RAPID CABG study.

Reference: So DYF et al. Presentado durante las sesiones científicas del AHA 2021.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Left or Right Transradial Approach? Comparing Radiation Exposure in Coronary Procedures

Radiation exposure during percutaneous procedures is a problem both for patients and operators. The transradial is currently the preferred approach, vs. femoral; however, whether...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Left or Right Transradial Approach? Comparing Radiation Exposure in Coronary Procedures

Radiation exposure during percutaneous procedures is a problem both for patients and operators. The transradial is currently the preferred approach, vs. femoral; however, whether...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...